As fairy tales go, the story spun at this year's Weldon Literary Moot falls squarely in the happily never after column.
Cinderella v. Charming, a royally contentious divorce case, landed in judicial mediation thanks to a battle over sole ownership of the former couple’s most prized possession — Cinderella’s glass slipper.
The dynamic cast at this year's moot, held last Tuesday in the Weldon Law Buiding, included law students Nicholas Worsley as Prince Charming, Geeta Mudhar as Rat, Chaeyon Lee as Bailiff, and English student Ella Ratz as Evil Stepmother. Halifax Fringe actresses Gil Anderson and Sara Graham played Cinderella and Faerie Godmother.
Law students Liam Wilford and Ferris Vasko appeared as counsel for Cinderella, and Davin Portz and Benjamin Lohoar represented Prince Charming. Schulich Law program manager Adam Guzkowski presided over the moot.
The annual sketch-comedy moot is organized by the Weldon Literary Moot Society (WLMS) and raises money for the Halifax Humanities Society, a non-profit organization that provides university-level humanities education to community members who otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford it. This year, the moot raised more than $2,000 for the Halifax Humanities Society.
Doomed to fail
Our story begins in a university classroom, in a law school far, far away . . .
Once upon a time, a charming prince met a beautiful maiden, they fell in love, got married after dating for a week and were supposed to live happily ever after. Except, they didn’t. Instead, the beautiful maiden was jealous and insecure, and the charming prince was a gaslighting narcissist.
Their relationship was doomed to fail from their first fateful meeting at the ball.
Fast-forward to seven days post-wedding when, after accepting the fact that their marriage was irrevocably broken, Cinderella and Prince Charming embarked on a complex and contentious divorce process. Following intense negotiations between their counsel, the two parties had agreed on all terms but one — who got to keep the infamous glass slipper.
Cinderella claimed ownership of the shoe, while Charming, who had a particular predilection for feet, maintained that she had given it to him as a gift.
Evidence presented by the prince’s counsel indicated Cinderella had the slippers custom-made, from glass, to show off her feet specifically to the prince and appeal to his ‘unique preferences’. His counsel also argued it was a gift given Cinderella’s phone number was inscribed on the heel, below the message, “For a good time, call me.”
Meanwhile, Cinderella maintained that while the slippers were designed to show off her feet to Prince Charming, they had been inspired by a pair her mother had owned and she had never intended to give one to him.
Riveting testimony
One of the witnesses called to testify on her behalf was Cinderella’s Faerie Godmother, who chose to use her time on the stand as an opportunity for shameless self-promotion, giving the audience the promo code “Divorce10” to receive a discount on her makeover services.
Another witness, Cinderella’s so-called Evil Stepmother, was proven instead to be a caring maternal figure who deeply loved her stepdaughter, despite years of being maligned by the manipulative maiden in order to drum up more sympathy for herself.
On the stand, Cinderella appeared to be a paranoid and controlling wife who yelled at Charming for talking to other girls when he was simply giving speeches to his subjects. It was also revealed that she kept rats on hand as servants, affectionately calling them her ‘woodland helpers’. However, when questioned about the situation, one of the rats explained they were in fact being held against their will and couldn’t leave as Cinderella had their passports.
When Prince Charming had the chance to testify, he came across as a narcissistic charmer who kept flirting with the judge and whose claim to the slipper may have been only based on his interest in feet.
After hearing testimony from witnesses and arguments from counsel, the judge awarded the slipper to Cinderella, but in the end it landed in the hands of the rats, in place of their unpaid wages.
Courtroom comedy for a good cause
Every year, the law students involved start brainstorming the moot’s concept in the fall, which is usually related in some way to the Halifax Humanities’ curriculum and then options are voted on by members in November. Previous moots have been based on Alice in Wonderland, Hamlet, Julius Caesar, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, and The Hobbit, to name a few.
From January to March, the society members reach out to find additional moot participants and after a couple of rehearsals to assign roles and sketch out the structure, the actors write their parts. After a final meeting, there is a dry run on the night of the show.
“The Literary Moot is the most fun thing I have had the pleasure to take part in in law school,” says Wilford, WLMS President. “As students in a demanding program, it can be so easy to get lost in the academia of it all. The literary moot gives us the chance to creatively apply the legal knowledge and skills that we have learned while raising funds for a program that directly benefits the community.”
Comments
comments powered by Disqus