Introducing the Schulich School of Law

By Marilyn Smulders - October 15, 2009

Seymour Schulich speaks to guests at a reception at the renamed Schulich School of Law. (Danny Abriel Photo)

Lord Dalhousie, George Munro, Lady Beaverbrook, Dorothy and Izaak Walton Killam, Seymour Schulich.

Mr. Schulich’s name joins the list of benefactors who have made “transformative gifts” to Dalhousie University and “profoundly shaped our destiny,” in the words of Dalhousie President Tom Traves at a celebration held in the Weldon Law Building on Thursday afternoon.

The Toronto-based billionaire who has given millions to universities and hospitals in Canada, the United States and Israel was on hand yesterday to write another cheque: this one for $20 million to Dalhousie’s Faculty of Law. It is the largest gift to Dalhousie by a living donor and the lead contribution in the university’s forthcoming capital campaign.

The words “Schulich School of Law” are now installed on the building at 6061 University Avenue in recognition of Mr. Schulich’s generosity. The Schulich name graces five other educational institutions across the country: the Schulich School of Business at York University in Toronto; the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ont.; the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary; the Schulich Library of Science and Engineering at McGill University in Montreal and the Schulich School of Music, also at McGill.

After moving to the podium himself, Mr. Schulich explained he doesn’t give money for buildings; he gives money to students with the aim of making higher education more accessible.

And that money flows immediately: 24 scholarships valued at $12,000 to $20,000 will be awarded this year and 41 next year. Students who get the scholarships must meet two out of three qualifications: academic achievement, community service or financial need.

“We don’t need only brilliant nerds,” said Mr. Schulich, who also established the Seymour Schulich Fund last year at Dalhousie. That fund awards four renewable scholarships in the fields of science and computer science—two are based on academic merit, two on community service.

'Ain't mashed potatoes'

The man who made his fortune in the mining and energy sectors says he’s gotten good at giving away money and, where his money goes, more follows. Dalhousie has committed to bringing in an additional $12 million within 10 years whether from private donors, government coffers or university operating budgets. “And $12 million ain’t mashed potatoes,” he said.

Michelle McBride, president of the Law Students’ Society (LSS), said law students have had a few weeks to let the magnitude of Mr. Schulich’s gift sink in and are getting accustomed to the name change. She says his generosity will allow one in five law students to attend the Schulich School of Law tuition free—“in the true Weldon tradition, this school is for those who love the law, not just for those who can afford to study it.”

In return, the third-year law student gave Mr. Schulich a lifetime membership to the social society Domus Legis. Law students get together most every Thursday at the Pogue Fado in downtown Halifax.

“Although the name is changing, the spirit and sense of community remains the same,” she added.

Afterwards, as guests nibbled hors d’oeuvres and sipped wine, other students say they’ve gotten used to the name change too and “it’s not an issue at all,” said Katherine Ng, a second-year law student from Toronto.

“At first, it did make us pause a bit because it is a change,” added Faizal Nuraney, a first-year law student from Vancouver. “But I think it’s going to elevate our status as a law school because the Schulich name has such prestige … We’re not walking away from our rich legacy by any means but we are taking a great step forward.”

Readers Say

I guess I find this a bit controversial, since he has been accused of exploiting other countries (i.e. Ghana) and displacing their local farmers to make profit.

If these accusations are true, although we are not responsible directly...shouldn't Dal consider that accepting this money is in a way taking from another country just to better our own? I think that it is important that we understand the role we play by accepting donations from such people.

Obviously he could take his money elsewhere but maybe there should be a shift in understanding and valuing where money comes from instead of just accepting that it is here.
to @ HAHP

Even though I understand your concern, I believe that money has no soul and tracing back where it was generated would be a very complicated and frustrating process, as most likely it will have caused some ill, along the way, somewhere.

If the money, no matter where it is coming from, is tremendously advancing Dalhousie's education and even helps students out on a financial and individual level, I think that the end justifies the means.

The alternative is that he uses the money to invest in another mining company, etc. Perhaps part of the reason why Schulich is so generous is to make up for his bad karma. If it ends up benefiting us, I think we should graciously accept the money, instead of worrying so much about how it was generated.

Cheers
If Jon Eden's comments above are truly reflective of the University's criteria (or lack thereof) for receiving "donations", then I think it's fair to say that the University was silly not to hold an open auction for the naming rights to the Commonwealth's oldest law school.

I'm sure a number of entities would see value in attaching their corporate identities to Dalhousie Law School's tradition of excellence. Given that Mr. Schulich's primary virtue in receiving the honour appears to be his extraordinary wealth, it seems a little short-sighted not to open this opportunity up to the deepest pockets.

While I generally agree that the money will be of significant benefit to the law school, I respectfully question why it was necessary to slather the Schulich name across a law school with 125 years of history and identity behind it. I would also question whether a negotiated transfer of naming rights can be accurately described as a "donation."

How will we honour the next benefactor who donates $21M?
To be honest my comment wasn't keeping in mind the fact that the Law School adopted the name of Schulich. That fact simply discredits my argument, as now as you guys have correctly argued, the school is associating themselves with a man that may have dealt in unethical business transaction. It is quite ironic that this would happen to a law school.

The main point I made still stands though, if someone offers you money, take it and make the most out of it! I call that the Robin Hood principle :D
This is disappointing news. The name of our Law School should not be akin to naming a sports or other facility for a term of years for a price. Worse yet, it seems that in this case, it is for perpetuity. I'd much prefer to retain "Weldon" or another person who made significant contributions to Canadian Society.
I also don't believe in giving a "free ride" to individual students. With our system of Government Student Loans and bursuries, surely each Student should pay a good portion of the costs of obtaining a higher education. There are many of us who paid our own way even though our families couldn't provide much or any monetary support. So it now seems that a Student could be needing financial support and is excellant in the community but, without achieving a pre-determined grade level, will get this free ride? If this is one of the factors in making this trade(money for name,then I disagree with it.
However, my primary concern is the tainted background of the Donor now being permanently affixed to our esteemed Institution.
I can only conclude that the University suffered a serious lapse in judgment due to the chance to grab this easy money, and that's doubly disappointing.
Hum, I am deeply concerned now after reading the comments of others regarding one possible source of wealth of Mr.Schulich. Interestingly, he has not only donated to Dalhousie, but to some other universities with a number of schools named after him such as the University of Western Ontario's Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, York University's Schulich School of Business, McGill University's Schulich School of Music,and the University of Calgary's Schulich School of Engineering. Who knows what school is next? It is a good thing to be philantropic, but when people begin to cast doubts on the source(s)of the funds being donated here and there, the recipients/beneficiaries are strongly advised to reconsider taking such monies, or at least investigate especially if their own reputation or image is important to them. If some of the business deals of Mr. Schulich in Ghana, Kenya and some places in South America are indeed as suggested by some of the bloggers here, it then appears like "Rubbing Peter to pay Paul" He would be indirectly contributing to poverty in those places. Since universities are centers of knowledge and sound judgement, we hope that these universities, especially Dalhousie will continue to be examplary in fighting injustices irrespective of who the perpetrators of such injustices and not be drowned by their financial need.
As a Dalhousie grad I'm incredibly disappointed by the majority of the bloggers comments. Frankly I'm embarrassed that most of the comments (especially law school students) are coming from a reactionary rather than informed position.

Please do your homework before making such accusations. Hopefully some of this money may improve the education, as well as the student stewardship of community.

Seymor Schulich was a disadvantaged student at McGill University that would not have made it to where he is today without the help (aid) of an academic scholarship. His simple task is now to afford this opportunity to other Canadians, simply asking that people remember his name.

Should any of you take the time to do your homework before commenting you may have found out that Mr Schulich's money came mostly from his gold exploration in Nevada (USA). His mine was bought by a company that already owned mine's in Ghana, South Africa and South America. To blame Mr Schulich for the misdoings of the company that bought out his is a pretty weak argument.

Rather than complaining about this gift, perhaps focus on the students that will benefit greatly from this enormous opportunity. Perhaps as an educated group of people we can all learn to accept this gift graciously and humbly in the spirit of university (as a place for enrichment), academic achievement and community.
I am shocked and disturbed that people would use a LAW SCHOOL blog as a forum to DEFAME someone. I'm guessing most of you are current or past Dal law students and, quite frankly, you should know better. At this point in the dialogue you're all just feeding off each other and NONE of you have disseminated correct information. Mr. Schulich's mining activities have always been restricted to North America. This talk of Ghana, South Africa, etc. is flat out wrong and I can't believe how quickly you all jumped on the band wagon without doing your research. You've even gone so far as to call the man a human rights abuser. Do you know that he's a recipient of the Order of Canada - do you really think they award those to just anyone? Mr. Schulich is one of Canada's greatest success stories. He's a self-made millionaire and one of the most respected business men in our country. The Schulich name has become an international brand with respect to education and success we should be honoured by the gift he has given Dalhousie. If you Nova Scotians/loyal Dalhousians were so concerned about namesake perhaps someone from your province should have stepped up and made this remarkable donation instead of having an Upper Canadian come in and save the day.
Personally, I am sorry that the name of Weldon may be forgotten. He was an outstanding gentleman and leader.
I have heard a story that at a meeting of the Board, when dealing with the resignation of a Professor of Law, wishing to accept an offer from Harvard, used a clause of his contract to support his resignation. One member of the Board was heard to say "Well, he can't be one of Weldon's men".
Personally, I am sorry that the name of Weldon may be forgotten. He was an outstanding gentleman and leader.
I have heard a story that at a meeting of the Board, when dealing with the resignation of a Professor of Law, wishing to accept an offer from Harvard, used a clause of his contract to support his resignation. One member of the Board was heard to say "Well, he can't be one of Weldon's men".
It was good to see that so many folks who wrote have a social conscience. Canadian
mining companies do have a bad reputation for exploitation especially in countries where
regulations are lenient or non-existent. I attended a meeeting at the Kenneth Rowe Bldg.
2-3 yrs. ago indicating as much and advocating for Canadian government regulations
governing Cdn. companies in other countries.

With all the discussion in recent yrs. on ethical investing it is concerning to see this man's
name in a number of Canada's institutions, even replacing some perfectly fine
benefactors, as in Dalhousie's case. It looks like money can buy you anything, even some
much needed redemption, as appears to be the case in this example.
Just to clarify a point. The building is, and will still be, named after our first Dean. There is no change in that, and actually his name is still hanging proud at the main entrance of the Weldon Building. The only thing that changed is that the School is now called Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University (rather than Dalhousie Law School - Weldon was never the name of the Law School-.)
Finally, this money is going to greatly improve the education at Dal Law in so many different ways, that I think it is absurd to question this donation. I bet any School would take this donation any day, since it will provide for students (although it seems some people here find it is cool to graduate with 100k debt, I personally don't), for faculty (more and better profs., the good ones receiving incentives to stay rather than move to Ontario or BC), for the enhancement of the building (which is falling apart - take for example the facade-.), and so on.
I think it is quite selfish to think that this money is no good, specially when people are making assumptions that may not be well founded. And if thy actually are, I rather have Mr. Schulich spending this 20 million dollars in education, than buying a new Yacht (which would not really make any social difference).
I know nothing about the allegations made as to how Mr. Schulich earns his money. But you'd be hard-pressed to find any large pile of money that couldn't be tagged with some controversy. After all, every facet of capitalism bears some kind of smudge in someone's eyes.

I suggest that, rather than turn away money, the right response is to do right by that money. I hope the commentors above find a way to use their Dalhousie education to assist some of the people they feel have been disadvantaged by the earning of this money.
I have never heard of Mr. Schulich, but I am very disturbed by the name change. When I say I graduated from Dalhousie Law School, people know what it is, where it is, and that it is (was?) a good school. Now, what do I say? That I graduated from Pepsi U?
I have only just learned of the name change and am very disappointed.
The more I think about it, the more sad I feel about this.
Some things shouldn't be for sale, and that should have been made clear to Mr. Schulich. Maybe he would have still made a substantial donation and settled for a more appropriate honour.
We'll never know now, I guess.
I have only just learned of the name change and am very disappointed.
The more I think about it, the more sad I feel about this.
Some things shouldn't be for sale, and that should have been made clear to Mr. Schulich. Maybe he would have still made a substantial donation and settled for a more appropriate honour.
We'll never know now, I guess.
''I have only just learned of the name change and am very disappointed.
The more I think about it, the more sad I feel about this. Some things shouldn't be for sale, and that should have been made clear to Mr. Schulich.''

Exactly my sentiments.

Not everything is for sale...especially to lawyers! My LLM is now tainted.I was so proud to be accepted to DALHOUSIE LAW SCHOOL. The identity and significance of my degree is imperilled. Schulich's School of Law appears remarkably similar to "Shoulton's School of Law''or anything else with no meaning. The Dalhousie Law School no longer exists. Another jewel for Schulich's collection. He should have been given a large plaque in the main foyer.

150 years of integrity for $20 million. We are held to a higher standard. And I don't mean more money. It WAS ''mashed potatoes''.


Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)