Introducing the Schulich School of Law
By Marilyn Smulders - October 15, 2009
![]() |
| Seymour Schulich speaks to guests at a reception at the renamed Schulich School of Law. (Danny Abriel Photo) |
Lord Dalhousie, George Munro, Lady Beaverbrook, Dorothy and Izaak Walton Killam, Seymour Schulich.
Mr. Schulich’s name joins the list of benefactors who have made “transformative gifts” to Dalhousie University and “profoundly shaped our destiny,” in the words of Dalhousie President Tom Traves at a celebration held in the Weldon Law Building on Thursday afternoon.
The Toronto-based billionaire who has given millions to universities and hospitals in Canada, the United States and Israel was on hand yesterday to write another cheque: this one for $20 million to Dalhousie’s Faculty of Law. It is the largest gift to Dalhousie by a living donor and the lead contribution in the university’s forthcoming capital campaign.
The words “Schulich School of Law” are now installed on the building at 6061 University Avenue in recognition of Mr. Schulich’s generosity. The Schulich name graces five other educational institutions across the country: the Schulich School of Business at York University in Toronto; the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ont.; the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary; the Schulich Library of Science and Engineering at McGill University in Montreal and the Schulich School of Music, also at McGill.
After moving to the podium himself, Mr. Schulich explained he doesn’t give money for buildings; he gives money to students with the aim of making higher education more accessible.
And that money flows immediately: 24 scholarships valued at $12,000 to $20,000 will be awarded this year and 41 next year. Students who get the scholarships must meet two out of three qualifications: academic achievement, community service or financial need.
“We don’t need only brilliant nerds,” said Mr. Schulich, who also established the Seymour Schulich Fund last year at Dalhousie. That fund awards four renewable scholarships in the fields of science and computer science—two are based on academic merit, two on community service.
'Ain't mashed potatoes'
The man who made his fortune in the mining and energy sectors says he’s gotten good at giving away money and, where his money goes, more follows. Dalhousie has committed to bringing in an additional $12 million within 10 years whether from private donors, government coffers or university operating budgets. “And $12 million ain’t mashed potatoes,” he said.
Michelle McBride, president of the Law Students’ Society (LSS), said law students have had a few weeks to let the magnitude of Mr. Schulich’s gift sink in and are getting accustomed to the name change. She says his generosity will allow one in five law students to attend the Schulich School of Law tuition free—“in the true Weldon tradition, this school is for those who love the law, not just for those who can afford to study it.”
In return, the third-year law student gave Mr. Schulich a lifetime membership to the social society Domus Legis. Law students get together most every Thursday at the Pogue Fado in downtown Halifax.
“Although the name is changing, the spirit and sense of community remains the same,” she added.
Afterwards, as guests nibbled hors d’oeuvres and sipped wine, other students say they’ve gotten used to the name change too and “it’s not an issue at all,” said Katherine Ng, a second-year law student from Toronto.
“At first, it did make us pause a bit because it is a change,” added Faizal Nuraney, a first-year law student from Vancouver. “But I think it’s going to elevate our status as a law school because the Schulich name has such prestige … We’re not walking away from our rich legacy by any means but we are taking a great step forward.”
Twitter
Readers Say
October 15, 2009 9:18 PM
If these accusations are true, although we are not responsible directly...shouldn't Dal consider that accepting this money is in a way taking from another country just to better our own? I think that it is important that we understand the role we play by accepting donations from such people.
Obviously he could take his money elsewhere but maybe there should be a shift in understanding and valuing where money comes from instead of just accepting that it is here.
October 19, 2009 1:54 PM
Even though I understand your concern, I believe that money has no soul and tracing back where it was generated would be a very complicated and frustrating process, as most likely it will have caused some ill, along the way, somewhere.
If the money, no matter where it is coming from, is tremendously advancing Dalhousie's education and even helps students out on a financial and individual level, I think that the end justifies the means.
The alternative is that he uses the money to invest in another mining company, etc. Perhaps part of the reason why Schulich is so generous is to make up for his bad karma. If it ends up benefiting us, I think we should graciously accept the money, instead of worrying so much about how it was generated.
Cheers
October 20, 2009 1:35 PM
I'm sure a number of entities would see value in attaching their corporate identities to Dalhousie Law School's tradition of excellence. Given that Mr. Schulich's primary virtue in receiving the honour appears to be his extraordinary wealth, it seems a little short-sighted not to open this opportunity up to the deepest pockets.
While I generally agree that the money will be of significant benefit to the law school, I respectfully question why it was necessary to slather the Schulich name across a law school with 125 years of history and identity behind it. I would also question whether a negotiated transfer of naming rights can be accurately described as a "donation."
How will we honour the next benefactor who donates $21M?
October 22, 2009 11:55 PM
The main point I made still stands though, if someone offers you money, take it and make the most out of it! I call that the Robin Hood principle :D
October 27, 2009 1:13 AM
I also don't believe in giving a "free ride" to individual students. With our system of Government Student Loans and bursuries, surely each Student should pay a good portion of the costs of obtaining a higher education. There are many of us who paid our own way even though our families couldn't provide much or any monetary support. So it now seems that a Student could be needing financial support and is excellant in the community but, without achieving a pre-determined grade level, will get this free ride? If this is one of the factors in making this trade(money for name,then I disagree with it.
However, my primary concern is the tainted background of the Donor now being permanently affixed to our esteemed Institution.
I can only conclude that the University suffered a serious lapse in judgment due to the chance to grab this easy money, and that's doubly disappointing.
October 27, 2009 5:18 AM
October 28, 2009 10:26 AM
Please do your homework before making such accusations. Hopefully some of this money may improve the education, as well as the student stewardship of community.
Seymor Schulich was a disadvantaged student at McGill University that would not have made it to where he is today without the help (aid) of an academic scholarship. His simple task is now to afford this opportunity to other Canadians, simply asking that people remember his name.
Should any of you take the time to do your homework before commenting you may have found out that Mr Schulich's money came mostly from his gold exploration in Nevada (USA). His mine was bought by a company that already owned mine's in Ghana, South Africa and South America. To blame Mr Schulich for the misdoings of the company that bought out his is a pretty weak argument.
Rather than complaining about this gift, perhaps focus on the students that will benefit greatly from this enormous opportunity. Perhaps as an educated group of people we can all learn to accept this gift graciously and humbly in the spirit of university (as a place for enrichment), academic achievement and community.
October 28, 2009 10:50 AM
October 28, 2009 1:01 PM
I have heard a story that at a meeting of the Board, when dealing with the resignation of a Professor of Law, wishing to accept an offer from Harvard, used a clause of his contract to support his resignation. One member of the Board was heard to say "Well, he can't be one of Weldon's men".
October 28, 2009 1:01 PM
I have heard a story that at a meeting of the Board, when dealing with the resignation of a Professor of Law, wishing to accept an offer from Harvard, used a clause of his contract to support his resignation. One member of the Board was heard to say "Well, he can't be one of Weldon's men".
October 28, 2009 4:11 PM
mining companies do have a bad reputation for exploitation especially in countries where
regulations are lenient or non-existent. I attended a meeeting at the Kenneth Rowe Bldg.
2-3 yrs. ago indicating as much and advocating for Canadian government regulations
governing Cdn. companies in other countries.
With all the discussion in recent yrs. on ethical investing it is concerning to see this man's
name in a number of Canada's institutions, even replacing some perfectly fine
benefactors, as in Dalhousie's case. It looks like money can buy you anything, even some
much needed redemption, as appears to be the case in this example.
October 28, 2009 7:04 PM
Finally, this money is going to greatly improve the education at Dal Law in so many different ways, that I think it is absurd to question this donation. I bet any School would take this donation any day, since it will provide for students (although it seems some people here find it is cool to graduate with 100k debt, I personally don't), for faculty (more and better profs., the good ones receiving incentives to stay rather than move to Ontario or BC), for the enhancement of the building (which is falling apart - take for example the facade-.), and so on.
I think it is quite selfish to think that this money is no good, specially when people are making assumptions that may not be well founded. And if thy actually are, I rather have Mr. Schulich spending this 20 million dollars in education, than buying a new Yacht (which would not really make any social difference).
October 30, 2009 3:27 PM
I suggest that, rather than turn away money, the right response is to do right by that money. I hope the commentors above find a way to use their Dalhousie education to assist some of the people they feel have been disadvantaged by the earning of this money.
January 21, 2010 2:00 PM
March 24, 2010 9:49 PM
The more I think about it, the more sad I feel about this.
Some things shouldn't be for sale, and that should have been made clear to Mr. Schulich. Maybe he would have still made a substantial donation and settled for a more appropriate honour.
We'll never know now, I guess.
March 24, 2010 9:49 PM
The more I think about it, the more sad I feel about this.
Some things shouldn't be for sale, and that should have been made clear to Mr. Schulich. Maybe he would have still made a substantial donation and settled for a more appropriate honour.
We'll never know now, I guess.
November 17, 2011 2:11 AM
The more I think about it, the more sad I feel about this. Some things shouldn't be for sale, and that should have been made clear to Mr. Schulich.''
Exactly my sentiments.
Not everything is for sale...especially to lawyers! My LLM is now tainted.I was so proud to be accepted to DALHOUSIE LAW SCHOOL. The identity and significance of my degree is imperilled. Schulich's School of Law appears remarkably similar to "Shoulton's School of Law''or anything else with no meaning. The Dalhousie Law School no longer exists. Another jewel for Schulich's collection. He should have been given a large plaque in the main foyer.
150 years of integrity for $20 million. We are held to a higher standard. And I don't mean more money. It WAS ''mashed potatoes''.