Lessons in love

By Rebecca Schneidereit - February 13, 2009

Knights and ladies in medieval Europe lived by codes of chivalry and virtue.

You may love it or hate it, but you can depend on it—every February 14, nestled neatly between Groundhog Day and Mardi Gras, Valentine’s Day rolls around. Is it a testament to the high value modern society places upon love? An excuse to cozy up on the couch with a box of chocolates? Or just an embarrassing love letter to consumerism? 

Wait, wasn’t it Saint Valentine’s Day at one point? How did an obscure religious holiday become a tribute to all things heart-shaped? With Valentine’s right around the corner, Dalnews has set out to conduct a cross-Dalhousie study of love in honour of this deceptively enigmatic, red-and-pink holiday.

It turns out love wasn’t much simpler in days of yore.

“The medieval Christian understanding was that love ultimately comes from God,” says history profesor Cynthia Neville. Western European medieval society is just one of her varied research interests.  

Medieval people believed the love of God bound the universe together. It was also the medieval era that gave rise to the tradition of chivalrous courtly love. “Courtly love… was the knightly expression of a divine, ideal love,” explains Dr. Neville, “And that love was offered to a beautiful noblewoman.” To love in the “courtly” tradition was seen as an ennobling, refining endeavour.

It was also time-consuming and generally limited to the aristocracy. Less wealthy classes had other ideas about love. “The common people struggled with the difference between lust and love,” says Dr. Neville. “Lust is one of the seven deadly sins. That’s not something you want to engage in.”

Things may not have changed much. “Literary scholars can trace the influences of these early writings about love… well into the modern period,” says Dr. Neville, giving supermarket romance novels as an example. “Those are really just 20th century versions of the same kind of literature… people back then knew the difference between romance and reality, just as we do today.”

It’s thoroughly modern affairs which concern Marina Adshade, who teaches “Economics of Sex and Love” at Dalhousie. The course premiered this year and the class of more than 100 students has been wildly successful; students discuss the pricing of prostitution, risky sexual behaviour and HIV prevalence. “The attendance in the class is really high… students are really engaged.”

Good news: despite the recession, courtship rituals have never been cheaper. “The cost of dating has fallen… you can sit on your computer at home and you can meet a hundred people in one night… it’s more efficient and less costly.” Dr. Adshade also covers the economics of what happens after you meet that special someone. “We’re going to talk about marriage systems. Why do we have monogamy in Canada? Why not polygamy?” She asks, noting that women in Halifax far outnumber men.

Dr. Adshade says there are two main reasons for marriage: as an environment in which to raise children, and as a system of division of labour. “It’s easier to do (household) tasks if you have two people, each doing the tasks that they’re best at.” Viewing marriage as a small business can be controversial, but “I think we’d all have to be very wealthy for this not to matter.”

While Dr. Adshade’s course deals with money, it doesn’t skirt affairs of the heart. “When we talk about love,” says Dr. Adshade, “We will talk about the biology behind love… but I do think love is a real thing. It being biological doesn’t make it any less real.”

So… what is love? Looks like the jury’s still out. Between chivalry and computer dating however, this Valentine’s Day should give the university plenty of food for thought.

Readers Say

Nice article! I like how you spoke with some profs in order to get some context.

For some reason when I ask people what they're doing for Valentine's day, most of the time their response is "nothing." I don't know the reason particularly, but it appears to be garnering less attention this year. Could it be a cynical rejection of popular culture as spurious and superficial? The studious ignorance of the ivory tower of academia toward such occasions becomes apparent as it passes judgement on 'the rest'...

Personally, I think it's great if you're not single.
Rebecca,

Thanks for this, and the beautiful illustration, but I would encourage all works of art to be attributed as both chivalrous and scholarly.

The illustration is the frontispiece to a minnesang (love poem) by Konrad von Altstetten, as found in the Codex Manesse c. 1304-1340 (Große Heidelberger Liederhandschrift). Most sources on Altstetten and his poetry are in German.

- Michael
Rebecca,

Thanks for this, and the beautiful illustration, but I would encourage all works of art to be attributed as both chivalrous and scholarly.

The illustration is the frontispiece to a minnesang (love poem) by Konrad von Altstetten, as found in the Codex Manesse c. 1304-1340 (Große Heidelberger Liederhandschrift). Most sources on Altstetten and his poetry are in German.

- Michael
With regards to Dr Adshade's comments, I highly doubt that people marry for the above mentioned reasons. I think the "environment in which to raise children" aspect is undoubtedly true, but people marry before they even plan children. Many people don't want children at all. I think it is a bit presumptuous to say that those two reasons are why people get married. Besides, these days one partner usually does the majority of household tasks on their own (whether it's male or female).

And suggesting polygamy simply because there are more females in this city than males is borderline outlandish. I'd love to see you and one of the professors from the Gender and Women's studies spark a debate on that one. That is simply feeding into gender inequality which is considered a little bit pre-modern, almost ancient practice. I'm all for polygamy if you're all for polyandry...after all, we are a modern day gender equality society now, are we not?

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)