Vaccines and autism: there's no link

By Dawn Morrison - October 31, 2008

Susan Bryson holds Dalhousie's Joan and Jack Chair in Autism Research. (Danny Abriel Photo)

She seemed to be everywhere. Last fall, actress Jenny McCarthy could be found on a host of American talk shows, including Larry King Live, The View and The Oprah Winfrey Show promoting her book Louder than Words: A Mother’s Journey in Healing Autism. During the Oprah appearance, she made several controversial claims, including the idea that vaccines had a role to play in causing her son’s autism. “The nurse gave (Evan) the shot... and soon thereafter—boom—the soul’s gone from his eyes,” she said.

Seen by millions of Oprah viewers, hers was a compelling story, presented passionately and articulately. But was she right? “I’m just a mom,” she said, adding she received her degree from “the University of Google.”

Despite the lack of credible scientific evidence establishing a connection between vaccines and autism, debate rages on. The controversy seems to be everywhere, fuelled by celebrities, bloggers, websites and the mainstream media. With autism rates continuing to rise (estimated at one child in 166), now more than ever parents are finding themselves confused and doubtful about whether to vaccinate their children.

What should parents believe? Is there a connection between autism and vaccines?

“We don’t want to close our minds to further research and inquiry, but we really need to treat the vaccine-autism connection as highly speculative,” says Susan Bryson, Dalhousie’s Joan and Jack Craig Chair in Autism Research, and one of the world’s foremost autism experts.

“We should still ask questions and seek answers, but in the meantime, we need to follow paths that are evidence-based and make sense theoretically,” she says. “Especially when we are considering what the priorities are for focusing our attention and money.”

While experts say there is no reliable way to track the impact of the controversy on Canada’s vaccination rates, in other countries like Britain, MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccination rates plummeted from 95 to 75 per cent (although that figure has begun to recover). The British outbreak of these diseases can be traced directly to one of the only studies that suggested a link between autism and vaccines. That study has since has been widely discredited, and retracted by most of its authors (see sidebar).

A quick Internet search uncovers dozens of articles, websites and discussion groups insisting the link between autism and vaccines exists. But scientific evidence establishing that link is much harder to come by.

Dr. Bryson notes the complexity of autism as a relatively new disorder (only on the books since the 1940s) may be a factor in the rise of some of the controversy. “There is so much we still don’t know about autism. Wouldn’t it be lovely if we discovered there was just one protein missing in our DNA that caused the disorder, or something simple like that? All we can say is that there is nothing in the science that has been discovered so far that suggests the answer will be that easy.”

In the meantime, she and her team continue to focus their efforts on early detection and intervention. She conducted a landmark epidemiological study of autism, the first of its kind for North America, right here in Nova Scotia in the 1980s. Since then, she and her researchers have studied 350 families for more than 10 years in a project she began at Sick Kids Hospital in Toronto.

That study has led to her current research on developing earlier autism detection and intervention for babies. She also designed and played a leadership role in implementing an early intervention treatment program for autistic children in Nova Scotia, and together with Dr. Isabel Smith, is tracking the results.

“We know that if we can get in earlier with a diagnosis, and focus on early intervention, we are better able to help the child,” she says. “The earlier the better.” Currently, her team is identifying signs of autism in children between 12 and 18 months old. So far, these signs (including delayed or lost speech, lack of social smiling, fixating on certain objects, failing to respond when name is called and unusual responses to sensations) are all behavioral. No reliable physical test is yet available.

As for the continuing debate over vaccines and autism, she says the focus needs to shift from speculation to proven fact. “There has been so much emphasis on the potential link between vaccines and autism, and not enough attention to the fact that diseases like measles can be fatal for children who are not immunized. That is a proven fact,” she says.

“It’s a lot sexier and more interesting to talk about what we think is fact, than to talk about the things we don’t know. With autism, there is still so much we just don’t know.”

   How the autism vaccine controversy began

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal Lancet published a controversial study by British gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues. The study purported a link between the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism, and Dr. Wakefield urged parents not to get the combined MMR vaccine administered to their children. He suggested instead parents have vaccines administered separately for the three diseases, each spaced out by a year.

A media firestorm developed. MMR vaccination rates in Britain dropped from a 95 per cent coverage rate (which is needed to prevent the diseases from spreading) to 75 per cent, as some worried parents opted not to vaccinate their children at all.

This led to an outbreak of all three diseases in Britain that continues to this day, and has spread to other countries including Canada. (The recent mumps outbreak in this country, which was experienced here at Dalhousie, can be traced back to these developments in Britain). Sadly, Britain experienced its first deaths due to these diseases in some 15 years.

In the meantime, Dr. Wakefield’s original study—involving just 12 subjects—has since been widely discredited. Countless studies since then have failed to corroborate his claims and 10 of the original 12 authors retracted the study’s findings. Lancet retracted the study, saying that Dr. Wakefield had a “fatal” conflict of interest that was undisclosed at the time of publication; he was doing paid research for a group of parents of autistic children who were planning to sue the makers of the MMR vaccine.

Dr. Wakefield and two colleagues are currently under investigation by the British body that governs physicians for unethical behaviour. They could lose their medical licenses when hearings reconvene next month. As a result of the Wakefield scandal, MMR vaccination rates have since climbed in Britain back up to about 85 per cent. Fear and doubt over vaccines and debate about their link to autism continue to this day.

Readers Say

I really wish these celebrities would stop filling peoples mind with garbage - it's irresponsible. People, sadly, hold celebs in high esteem and that gives them an air of credibility. By pushing their own ideas (Charlie Sheen's 9/11 conspiracies, anyone?) they give voice to issues or concerns that really don't have any. Ben Stein hosting an Intelligent Design-promoting movie? Seriously?
I should have taken my degree with Google instead of Dal, would have saved some coin, that's for sure.
It isn't the celebrities - parents have been screaming about it for years. Our kids get sick after vaccination and its a fact. It happens in front of your eyes. And because you were responsible enough to vaccinate - you have sick kids and as another slap in the face your insurance doesn't cover treatment or therapy. My kids are fully vaccinated - and 2 of them are autistic.
The worst horror of Jenny McCarthy's view is indicated by her remark that her child's soul was gone (as a result of the vaccine). I know a lot of autistic people of all ages: if anyone has a soul, they do!! That kind of talk leads to dehumanisation, a dangerous path to follow.

In addition, as someone who has worked with adults brain damaged by measles side-effects as well as with autistic adults I can say there is No Comparison between the terrible harm caused by the measles, and the bizarre atypicalities of the autism. Unfortunately charities often whip up the fear of autism in order to raise funds (eg the hugely influential Autism Speaks in the US which has James Watson on its website, telling the world that "Autism is the worst thing that can happen to a family")
I want to agree with Dinah Murray. The suggestion that autistic people are somehow soulless is an ignorant and dangerous remark.

I've also known and worked with many autistic people. Many are proud of who they are, and some are among the most interesting, compassionate and brave people that I've ever known. Autistic teenagers and adults do follow these public debates, and many feel deeply hurt and frustrated by what they hear.

Autism brings it's own challenges, and it is unfortunate that for many autistics the greatest challenges are overcoming misunderstandings, misrepresentations, dehumanizing treatment and disrespect.

For those interested, here are several websites that autistic self-advocates have recommend to me:
Neurodiversity
No Autistics Allowed
Ballastexistenz
Dr. Morton Ann Gernsbacher's Laboratory

* Apparently links are not allowed in the comments, so you'll need to look up these websites on your own.
I agree with what Jenny MCarthy is doing and the accusation of ignorance should be pointed the other way. Do you have any knowledge of what is actually in our vaccines? Vaccines are full of toxins such as mercury, fermaldehyde (a known cancer causing agent), Phenol (a common disinfectant, dye, and a ddeadly poison), aluminum phosphate (toxic), acetone (a solvent used in FINGERNAIL POLISH), dead animal cells and proteins, Mercury, the list goes on. Vaccine research is outdated and there has been direct evidence that 1 in 150 children vaccinated with the MMR and Measles vaccine have an adverse reaction AND 1 in 150 children are Autistic!!! So who is the one putting our children at risk by their ignorance? It is not about to vaccinate or not to vaccinate but more along the lines of Forcing a Safer Vaccination and are they currently worth the risk?
People are irrational and stupid. They will believe what they want to believe. If they refuse to vaccinate their children out of fear of what they think might happen, that is their own business. And when their children are permanently disabled or even killed by a disease which could have been prevented through vaccination if not for parental stupidity, that is natural selection.
I happen to be on the autism spectrum, and I cannot stand listening to these clowns and their pseudoscientific nonsense about vaccines causing autism. People used to believe it was caused by poor parenting, and that turned out to be completely false. Until the actual cause of the problem is found, people should stop pretending to know what they are talking about.
Of course, this opinion does not matter. As I have already stated, I happen to be on the autism spectrum. Therefore, in the eyes of those who like to pretend that they know more than everyone else around them, I am little more than a drooling, soulless idiot with no understanding of the world around me.
While the scientific community has been extra busy in trying to prove that you might get sick from measles if you don’t get vaccinated for measles, I would like for them to prove once and for all, that vaccinations just don’t give kids autism. After all- it’s their product and our kids.

Vaccines are sold by drug companies. How many advertisements from drug companies have you seen that did not have a long warning list of side effects at the end? Possibly all of them.

I had the MMR vaccination and it was the last vaccination I ever received- because it nearly killed me. I reacted to the vaccine in such a violent manner, it shocked our medical doctor. His explanation was that it was just "the darndest thing".

So now I don’t receive vaccines and I lived through both Dalhousie mumps scares.

Autism rates are rising at a terrifying rate. Our physiological environment is also changing is very new and different ways. The facts presented about vaccinations by the scientific community are hard to rely on because we have never been willing to test them against a population that isn’t vaccinated. We have made other improvements as simple as sanitation that affect the spread and control of disease.

Again; vaccines are sold by drug companies. And they sell an awful lot of them.
The possible link between autism and vaccination is not pseudoscience, it's a real possibility. The drug companies who sell vaccinations have not been able to tell the public that their products do not cause side effects. Drug companies also can’t tell us that we will get sick if we're not vaccinated. I'm not vaccinated, and I'm not sick, and my parents aren't stupid. My parents are medical doctors. My parents and I, along with thousands of others, have questions about vaccines that drug companies can’t answer. It is not stupid or irrational to be critical of the substances that we inject into our bodies. Being critical about the fact that new, and unexplained medical conditions are evolving at the same pace as western drug science, is one choice we are allowed to make.
Christina Ciaccio, there are so many things wrong with your statements about vaccines. It's regrettable that you haven't been getting your information from reputable sources.
Perhaps we in the scientific community are not doing a very good job about getting the facts out.

Firstly, only the flu vaccine contains thimerosal, a mercury-containing antiseptic compound. Children don't receive flu vaccinations, and thimerosal was phased out of children's vaccines by 2001, yet autism diagnoses continue to rise.

The amounts of formaldehyde, phenol, and acetone (all needed for the manufacturing process) present in vaccines are so small that they does no present a significant risk. Like all substances, the toxicity depends on the dose. Aluminum phosphate is not present at harmful levels (it actually has a beneficial effect).

Dead animal cells? No. The cells don't go in the vaccines, the antigens are extracted from cells, and the antigens go in the vaccines.

Proteins...well, I guess you had to get one right. That is precisely how vaccines work - the immune system detects the foreign (harmless) proteins, builds antibodies to destroy them, and "remembers" the proteins. When the host is infected with the real disease, the immune system is ready.

It's a shame that this debate continues to attract attention. It saps resources and energy away from promising leads for autism research, and confuses the public about the safety of vaccines, one of the greatest advances public health of all time. When the voices of Jenny McCarthy and other ill-informed celebrities drown out the voice of (virtually) the entire scientific community, there is a serious problem.
I would be interested to know if the private and corporate funders contributing to Dalhousie's Joan and Jack Chair in Autism Research would support Dawn Morrison carrying out research into the links between mercury ions(a neuro-toxin), vaccinations, and autism. Mercury is frequently used as a preservative in vaccines.

David Ayoub, M.D., has researched extensively on this as well as many prominant researchers in this area including Dr. Viera Scheibner , PhD., Dr Daniel Dantini, a renowned researcher on delayed food allergies, Dr. Mary Megson, a developmental pediatrician, and many others.

Some critical thinking please!
I am a parent who is deeply concerned about whether or not we should vaccinate our son who is now 2 with the MMR vaccine or our daughter who is entering kindergarden who now needs the second dose of MMR.
I read all of your comments here so far and my question is why do we have to have any of these toxic ingredients at all in the vaccines even when you say they are in such small doses? Can't there be non toxic ingredients or safer ingredients? I understand both sides of the coin when we talk about whether there is a link or not to autism but I'd like to see the proof there is no link and who did this study and would they be responsible for my children when they get their MMR vaccination if they start to show signs of Autism after and become Autsitic. If they said yes because they 100percent believe there is nolink well that is fine because if they kids became autistic they would say there is no link and then what? They would live their lives with Autism and so would I with them. What parent would lend over the responsibility in the first place? Lots do and without question but I have too many questions and no answers and my gut tells me not to do it.
I have good friend whose son is Autistic and she believes that the vaccine does not cause Autism but believes it could trigger the existing Autism that is already there and would now come out. Why do we have to subject our babies to all of these foreign materials all at such a young age and in such a short time frame? By the time they are 5 think about how many vaccines they have?
Getting to the flu shot. It is recommended in Canada for babies to have the flu shot at 2,4 and 6 months of age.
I have not had the flu shot nor any of our 3 children nor will we. YOu can't be protected from this years flus until next year because we need the strains in order to make the vaccine and each vaccine has about 3 strains of flu. so think about it. If you get the flu shot for 10 years you now have 30 strains in you.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)