An open exchange of ideas

Dal News Staff - June 26, 2007

Freedom of inquiry and expression, central values of universities around the world, are meaningless without freedom of association. The proposed boycott of Israeli universities under review by BritainÕs University and College Union (UCU) represents a gross violation of these essential notions. A tiny fraction of the UCUÕs 120,000 members, by a vote of 158 to 99, have raised concerns which merit strong condemnation.

Universities do not have foreign policies and they must assert their right always to be independent of government dictates in the name of short-term political agendas. Individual scholars must be free to pursue their research and their ideas with colleagues freely chosen across the world. Ironically, the UCUÕs leader recently rejected a proposed British government invitation to tackle violent extremism, urging its members to Òoppose government attempts to restrict academic freedom or free speech on campus. Lecturers want to teach students. If they wanted to police them, they would have joined the force.” The suggestion that British professors should boycott universities and scholars from other countries surely sits poorly with this sentiment.

Faculty, staff and students at Dalhousie University have a network of global relationships with counterparts who come from diverse social, political and ideological environments. These relationships persist despite such differences because of our common commitment to the open exchange of ideas, a basic freedom that is central to all learning and discovery.

Tom Traves
President and Vice-Chancellor
Dalhousie University

For further reading, see: Slamming Israel, giving Palestinians a free pass in The Economist

Readers Say

I strongly support your statement on the University's behalf in favor of freedom of association, inquiry and expression and criticizing the proposed UCU boycott. I am pleased to see you take a clear stand in favor of the open exchange of ideas and pointing out the hypocrisy of the recent UCU vote.
I appreciate Dr. Traves’s denunciation of the proposed boycott and hope that Dalhousie will not participate in any academic events that exclude Israelis. While I do not support the current Israeli government’s stance on the Palestinians, the attempt to boycott Israeli academics smacks of anti-Semitism. How else to explain this move at a time when Israel’s current government is attempting peace initiatives while Hamas continues to advocate the destruction of Israel? There are horrendous atrocities happening elsewhere throughout the world, but the British academics’ focus on a condemnation of Israel at the same time that this same group rejected government interference in academic freedom regarding extremism elsewhere is more of the same historically for the Jewish people. If we are to build a world of tolerance and understanding, academia needs to see more collaboration and dialogue, not less.
Thank you President Traves!
I hope that a similar statement against the boycott would come from the CAUT.
In contrast, in the June issue of the CAUT Bulletin, they include a list of censured administrations in the U.S. This is a regular feature of their Bulletin. But, they do not include any problems in any other countries concerning academic freedom.
On the theme of " an open exchange of ideas", perhaps a link pointing to the UCU's rationale and perspective should be posted as well. If such a movement is gaining momentum in the U.K. among educated people, surely there must be some reason for it. It is important, even if only to exercise our critical thinking skills, for readers to be at least exposed to the rationale behind the boycott.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)