Shoes for souls helps needy feet

Nursing student's charity sends thousands of shoes to Zambia

Katie Parks - April 25, 2012

sneakers
The Shoes for Souls campaign sends shoes to communities in Zambia. (Photo Daniel Abriel)

Two years ago, Dalhousie’s own Kyle Warkentin launched his Shoes for Souls campaign.

After a trip to Kabwe, Zambia with the charitable organization Hands at Work, he noticed a way that he could make a difference: by focusing on the feet.

Shoes for Souls began as a small collection and soon became a large campaign involving the community and a committee of eight volunteers. Arriving at Dalhousie as a nursing student, he continued his work, getting classmates and other Dal students to help out. The result: sending 15,000 shoes to Zambia.

“It’s easy for people to send money to places like Kabwe, but most people don’t know where that money is going to wind up, if it’s even going to reach the people,” he explains. “If it does reach the people, what are they going to do with it? With sending something like shoes, it may not have a long term impact necessarily, but it’s something that people can use immediately and that is what is going to make a difference.”  

He also credits his first-hand perspective. “If more people had the opportunity to participate in experiences like I did, I think they would be more inclined to take part in hands on experiences instead of simply sending money to places like Zambia.”

He has hopes to launch the campaign again in the future, only he’ll “organize things a little better,” since the first campaign came together rather quickly.

And while he knows that one charity cannot make all the difference to one town’s situation, it can be a factor in making small, but gradual changes to the moral of the village and the situations of the individuals that live there.

That, he says, is what makes all the difference.

Readers Say

I disagree. Sometimes "simply sending money" is more effective and serves a higher purpose (if directed towards the right organizations) than sending a bunch of good-intentioned shoes to people, whether or not they want/need them.

How does someone get involved and drop shoes off?
Congratulations Kyle, it was a great idea that worked! I happily contributed some gently used shoes to your cause...glad to hear they made it to Zambia.

Another place that needs decent shoes is Cuba. A few years ago I befriended a family there and the mother mentioned an item they really needed were decent shoes. She said they were very hard to get in Cuba. I can't make it to Cuba this year but I've loaded up a couple of friends who are going there with some gently used sandals/shoes. I didn't need them and I hope they make a difference.

if you're going to Cuba, keep this in mind...
Not that it isn't well intentioned, but I'm just sayin'...

http://nymag.com/health/features/46213/

Cheers Kyle and Bless your kind heart.
This is complex question. What about small vendors that sell shoes in the community - has this project eliminated their livelihoods? Certainly people were getting shoes from somewhere before this project came along, and while I understand that Kyle's intention may come from a very good place, I remain concerned about the notion of who decides "what makes a difference". As a development practitioner, I suggest that Shoes for Souls do a proper evaluation of the lessons learned from this experience and speak at length with a variety of local community members to see what affect this process has had, good and bad. And then share those lessons widely with the Dal community and those that volunteered and contributed shoes. Arguably, it is this kind of sharing of knowledge that truly has the possibility to make a difference, right here.
I strongly second Andrea's comment. There is a reason why Saundra Schimmelpfenning called her blog 'Good Intentions Are Not Enough'-because in-kind donations, e.g. shoes (http://goodintents.org/in-kind-donations/toms-shoes) or T-Shirts (http://goodintents.org/good-intentions-blog/world-visions-addiction-to-swedow) are problematic forms of charitable giving to say the least and there are other ways to deal with footwear issues in Africa (http://goodintents.org/in-kind-donations/socially-conscience-shoes). And if you like a good metaphor, there are indeed 'shoestrings attached' to the political economy behind the idea (http://prospect.org/article/shoestrings-attached). Right now, Kyle's project doesn't need more shoes, but more strategic input and discussions of how to take the idea forward with the least harm done to local communities and the best transparency and feedback regarding the learning process for everybody involved. The real work just started and it will remain a challenging project that shouldn't necessarily be replicated as 'best practice'
I strongly agree with Andrea and Tobias. But before I comment further, I'd like to say, good for you, Kyle for wanting to contribute. But that being said, I hope you will look at the links provided and do more research on development and aid issues before you continue sending shoes to any developing country. I have spent time in Africa. I have watched local shoe makers create beautiful sandals and shoes. And I have discussed with locals how the donations that end up in second-hand markets have had a harmful impact on the textile and shoe industries in Africa. I believe that it may be far more beneficial to collect money and help out the local shoe-makers' industry if you would like to contribute in the area of shoes. There are many people who work in the area of development and global health at Dal, with lots of stories and data to share on issues like this. It wouldn't be hard to find people with good advice to advance this project in a sustainable and ethical way.
After further thinking about this, it strikes me that there are thousands of impoverished families living in Canada who would probably be delighted to have decent shoes. It's good that people are often so willing to "help" when it is for an African context, but they should learn how to do that with the most benefit and least harm. Meanwhile, it is unfortunate that they overlook those who need help at home - where those interventions that they thought of are are more likely to be culturally appropriate and necessary. So how about it, Kyle, will you consider donating those shoes to Aboriginal communities in need, to "street kids," to refugees, or to other impoverished Canadians? Thanks for thinking about it!
I do mission work in Zambia through Mission Possible, America to Zambia, of which I am the founder. We have shipped many things, but never used shoes. Did you need a certificate of International Fumigation? Blessings for what you do. As for money vs. goods, we do both. With money, it either sends directly to our mission liaison, a Belgian Priest who we know personally (and a man who can stretch a dime to a dollar), and we also carry cash there when our team goes, and we make the purchases/donations on-site. Other than that, I would not send money without a personal contact person at the other end.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)