Dalhousie named one of Canada's Top 100 Employers

First university in Atlantic Canada to make the national report

Ryan McNutt - October 7, 2011

Dal employees Bill Gilbert (Custodial Services) and Monica Baccardax (MedIT). (Danny Abriel photo)
Dal employees Bill Gilbert (Custodial Services) and Monica Baccardax (MedIT). (Danny Abriel photo)

There are more than 5,500 employees at Dalhousie. They come from different places, different backgrounds and bring different perspectives to help support teaching, research and operations at the university.

And they’re the biggest reason that Dalhousie was just named one of Canada’s Top 100 Employers – the first ever Atlantic Canadian university to make the list and only one of four universities in the country.

The recognition comes from the annual report of employers published in the Globe and Mail. Dalhousie received 'A' or 'A+' ratings in the categories of 'Physical Workplace,' 'Financial Benefits and Compensation,' 'Health & Family-Friendly Benefits,' 'Training & Skills Development' and 'Community Involvement.'

Read: Dalhousie's profile on the Top 100 Employers website

In a memo to the Dal community, President Tom Traves highlighted the university’s accomplishments in recent years—from the increase in faculty research awards to the success of the Bold Ambitions campaign to date —and saluted the employees who made them possible.

“To earn this distinction, we required a special workplace for terrific employees doing a great job,” he said. “Dalhousie’s award was truly earned by every member of our community.”

Striving for inclusion and support


And every member of that community has his or her own reasons for being here.

Monica Baccardax has been with the Faculty of Medicine for 33 years, and is now a project manager with MedIT. She’s not only worked with various departments at the medical school, but her role supporting recruitment and campaigning for Dalhousie’s United Way effort has introduced her to many other community-minded staffers across the university.

“It’s a great way to learn more about what’s going on at Dalhousie, while also making a difference, even if indirectly,” she says. “It doesn’t matter what faculty you’re in, there’s a community here. We’re all doing different work, but our goals are the same.”

Bill Gilbert, a working foreman with Custodial Services, also believes in the power of an inclusive community. Along with evening custodial supervisors Cindy Murphy and Juanita Haas, he spearheaded the “Respect” campaign within Facilities Management, encouraging employees to wear pink buttons and pink gloves to reinforce that everyone and their ideas, skills and thoughts should be treated fairly.

“I find that if you put a hand out here, you get two in return,” says Mr. Gilbert, who has been with Dalhousie for four years. He says his work has been encouraged both by his own leaders as well as other leaders on campus, and he hopes to continue to see it expand in the future.

“I feel like Dalhousie supports and gives latitude to those who want to make a difference....I’ve worked for a lot of huge organizations in my life, but I’ve never encountered a more supportive employer.”

The reason we’re here


For those on the front lines of Dal’s teaching and research, supporting both students and colleagues is a key part of being a university employee.

“I think Dalhousie blends the best of big and small university environments,” says Srini Sampalli, professor with the Faculty of Computer Science, noting what he perceives as a true sense of collegiality on campus. “What is remarkable is that the university has a rich research culture as well as student-centered learning.”

And for Dr. Sampalli it’s the student experience, first and foremost, that keeps him excited about coming to work each morning.

“I’m very passionate about teaching. I believe students are the reason we’re here, and I feel privileged to get to teach and work with students.... It’s like that Chinese saying, ‘Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life.’ And I feel like I chose a job I love.”

Setting a standard


Katherine Sheehan, assistant vice-president of Human Resources, is quick to credit the entire Dal community for helping make the Top 100 recognition possible. In particular, she’s thankful for the staff across various departments and offices who were involved in preparing materials during the application process.

She adds that while being named one of the best employers in Canada is a source of pride for Dalhousie, it’s also something of a challenge.

“This symbolizes that we’re a workplace that attracts and supports excellent people – and it means we have to continue to live up to that standard,” she says, noting that the forthcoming release of the latest workplace survey (scheduled for October 17) will provide more insight into how Dalhousie can continue to improve as an employer.

“No workplace is without its issues, and I’m sure our employees will—and should—point to this award as something to hold us accountable to.”

After all, she says, the sort of accomplishments cited by Dr. Traves can only happen if there is a community of employees to help achieve them.

“On their behalf, we're committed to earning this distinction every day."

Read: The full list of Canada's Top 100 Employers.

------------

One of Canada’s Top 100, and darn proud of it!

By Katherine Sheehan, Assistant Vice-President, Human Resources


One of the best in the country? You bet we are.

Whether we say it loudly or think it quietly, most of us already know this is true. But it’s a great affirmation to have the Globe and Mail declare our success to the rest of the country as part of their Top 100 Employers project.

Every employee in this university – no matter what your position or your role -- should take great pride in this recognition. Ultimately, the Top 100 is a salute to each and every person who works here, and it builds on our already strong reputation across Canada. Closer to home, we can be even more proud knowing that Dalhousie is the only Atlantic Canadian university to ever be chosen a Top 100 employer.

The Globe and Mail awarded this recognition to Dalhousie but you – as an employee – should claim it because, without you, we would not be a Top 100 employer.  With that in mind, I hope you’ll accept this Top 100 designation as your own.

Over the next 12 months, I encourage you to share this Dal success – tell your friends and neighbours; include it in your email signature; make it part of your PowerPoint presentations.

You’ll find all you need at commark.dal.ca/top100/index.html.

Let everyone know that we’re darn good, and getting better.

Readers Say

Would be nice if Dalhousie could expand beyond national recognition. I was disappointed to see that Dal didn't even make it onto Forbes' current list of the top 200 universities.
One of the top five reasons Dal is on the list:

"for employees nearing retirement, the University offers phased-in retirement work options along with the stability of a defined benefit pension plan"

Hmmmm



Bravo! This speaks volumes to our work environment. This IS a good place to work.
I sincerely hope that Dalhousie will continue to offer its employees the stability of a defined benefit pension plan - even if that means that employees need to increase their contribution to that plan. It is a worry that discussions about this valued pension plan are becoming a roadblock to successful contract negotiations between the unions and the Board of Governors. I encourage Dalhousie and the unions to work together for our common good to ensure the long-term survival of this plan. Rumblings of strikes and stalled negotiations are not good for morale, not good for students, and not good for our community. Let's stop the posturing and make this work - for the good of everyone involved.
Very odd!

The day before (on 6 October 2011) Prof. Anthony Stewart, President of Dalhousie Faculty Association, circulated some disturbing news and I wish to hear comments from the senior administration on such a sharp discord between the official communications and the faculty representatives:

"The administration does not appear to trust us enough to treat us with the respect due a group of highly trained and skilled professionals. And we do not trust them because of a practice of decision-making that often ignores our interests, input, or concerns."

and

"Considering the Board team's insistence upon resolving the 'pension governance' issue before any discussion of monetary issues in this round of collective bargaining, this is the equivalent of insider trading in the stock market."
I'm pretty sure this ranking does not take into account Dal's treatment of grant-paid research staff who are treated as second-class employees within the University (no pension, no tuition assistance - up until recently we were even denied dental coverage).
For anyone who wants to read the report you can find it searching google with key words. eluta/ dalhousie/ top 100.

I have a few issues with this "report". Free tutiion is actually a taxable benefit as is the 50% tution waiver for immediate family. Besides the elephant in the closet (the defined pension plan, stalled contract talks) some of the other statements that bothered me were a " subsidized home Internet access; subsidized home and auto insurance " , "Employees receive 6 personal days off " and "year-end bonuses for some employees."

As a NSGEU employee I am not aware of these benefits but more then likely they are not offered to my association.
I'm sorry, but I can't walk away from this report being happy or even proud because all I see in this report is despairing differences between the different employee groups here at Dalhousie and benefits /perks being received.
My guess is that the administration did a great job of selling to globe and mail the nice working environment of... administration!

I have been to easily a dosen universities recently and dalhousie ranks:

* dead last in terms of campus food options
* parking disaster [see CBC article; whole world knows the story now!]
* endless talk of budget cuts/hiring freezes from administration at the same time as they are building new buildings and student population is increasing etc...

As a faculty member, I certainly DO NOT feel this is a great working environment! More like administrating blowing its own horn...
I agree with David .... the grant paid research staff are treated far below par ..... many of these dedicated individuals who have been "employees" for over 20 years receive absolutely no recognition or support regarding the important roles they play, not only in the research itself but in helping to bring much needed research funding to the University!! There is no "equal pay for equal work" mandate used for these individuals ..... they are truly an overlooked and undervalued resource in the Dalhousie community.
As someone who has witnessed Dalhousie's retaliatory response to employees who attempt to raise problems of discrimination within the university, (especially racialized employees) this news makes me want to beat my head against the wall, although because of mynational equity work, I know that this is not the first time that a university with these kind of problems has received a positive workplace award. As a former member of the Morale Committee I am also skeptical that all the alienation we encountered from all employee groups has disappeared. (We obviously have a very talented set of public relations officers, however.)
I'm a little unimpressed with recognition that is a result of one nominating one's self - it would be more impressive if this was an externally nominated distinction. That being said, I do enjoy working at Dal. To respond to David, it is unfortunate you feel that way as a grant paid employee; however, the fact does remain: although you (and all other grant paid employees) are indeed a very important part of Dalhousie, you are not technically a Dal employee, you are an employee of the researcher. Your terms of employment are bound by the regulations as set by the granting agencies, and Dal (as the keeper of the gate so to speak), can only provide you with employment parameters as specified by that grant agency. I know I'm not alone when I say that grant paid employees are very much valued by your Dal peers.
Dalhousie's decision to disallow research employees joining he pension plan will negatively affect researchers' ability to attract employees. This will ultimately affect the quality of research at Dalhousie of which the president is so proud. Dalhousie has a history of treating research employees as second class employees. They should be ashamed of their treatment of these often extremely loyal employees.
As a grant paid employee I wanted to complete the "2011 Work place Survey", was unable, and when I inquired why, I received following email;

"I looked you up on our system, and noted that you are a classified as Research Support Staff. We did not send this survey to Associated and Grant Paid employees, as technically you are an employee of the Grantee and not the University. "

More simply our options were not wanted!
As a staff member, our "perks" are not the same as what is outlined in this article. I've worked here over a decade and have never had a performance evaluation. I feel the health coverage is not above-average - I don't participate because my spouse's health coverage is much better. The tuition discount is considered taxable, and while it's great to have the discount, the tax man gets you in end. The workplace survey results are revealed but the negatives are glossed over and I've yet to see any changes implemented as a result of this survey. I, along with many others, feel Dal is a good place to work but don't see it being in the top 100 in the country. There is a lot of improvement needed to reach that status. Dal needs to recognize it's staff, who keep the wheels turning.
I wonder if anyone from the Globe spoke to any of the employees who are stressed to the nines because administrative positions are not being replaced or restaffed and their own job responsibilities continue to increase with no increase in pay or hours in a day?
I am very much in agreement with David's comment. I can't imagine the number of grant-paid staff at an institution of this size. Grant-paid staff were not allowed to complete the survey because they are not considered Dalhousie staff. This dichotomy and oversight is frustrating.
I was surprised by this ranking. While I enjoy working at Dalhousie, there certainly is room for improvement. Many departments are understaffed. We've lost full-time administrative positions in my department, positions have been cut back, and some are vacant and may not be re-filled. I've worked for Dalhousie full-time for almost two years, but because I am a term employee, I am not eligible for any benefits. I'm not even permitted to buy into group dental and medical insurance programs. I'm not the only one in my department who is in the same situation -- and I'm wondering how many there are university-wide. Rather than filling positions with permanent staff, positions are being filled with employees working on short-term contracts. I'm always wondering whether or not my contract will be renewed. I'm relieved when it is, but the hope of actually getting a permanent position with benefits feels like a pipe-dream. I understand the frustration of grant-paid employees who aren't permitted to be part of the pension plan, but there is another group of employees here at Dal who are working full-time but are not granted even basic benefits like dental and medical insurance.
I was surprised by this ranking as well. But what it said to me is that there is disparity among employee groups with some getting the "perks" and others not. This inequality only leads to poor morale which is what I see generally and it seems to be growing. This could easily be a wonderful place to work, but we're certainly not there yet. Treating everyone as equals would certainly go a long way to making that happen. It not just "talking the talk" but sincerely "walking the walk". Why don't we really start to do that? Dalhousie is blessed with loyal "on the ground" employees...let's treat them right.
I am a student at Dal's law program, originally from out of province. While Halifax offers many charms, Dalhousie, is not one of them. Every time I interact with an administrative aspect at Dal, the procedures take considerably longer than they should (much less efficient than UVic or UofT).
My impression is that its a top employer because the employees are not held accountable. Standards of performance and professionalism are very lax, so it may be a nice place to work, being very laid back and undemanding, its been an extremely frustrating institution to interact with. This applies to both the admin staff, professors, and the career development office especially.
The law CDO is one of the worst run, inept, and inefficient university offices I have ever come across.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)