Boy band blitz
by Ryan McNutt - March 19, 2010
![]() |
| Craig Jennex checks out the selection at the local record store (Nick Pearce photo) |
Quick: name the only album of the past 20 years to sell more than two million copies in a single week.
The answer: N’Sync’s No Strings Attached, released in 2000.
That the boy band craze could be simultaneously so massive and so divisive – splitting schoolyards between the pop kids and rock kids, not to mention between N’Sync and Backstreet Boys fans – speaks to its gigantic impact at the turn of the last century. Today though, with most of the groups relegated to the bargain bin of music history, it’s a trend that many would rather forget.
Craig Jennex doesn’t want us to.
That doesn’t mean the music and gender studies student wants us to all rush to Value Village to buy used O-Town and 98 Degrees CDs; he’s not exactly the biggest fan of boy bands himself. And admittedly, his honours research probably isn’t going to bring Backstreet back single-handedly. But he is making a case that these admittedly “fluffy” pop artists, by breaking down traditional constructs of masculinity, left a legacy that still resonates 10 years later.
“I think they really did some good for our society’s understanding of gender and sexuality, whether people like to accept it or not,” he says, connecting the boy band craze with the rise of the metrosexual movement in the past decade. “For example, it really wasn’t acceptable for guys to be seen dancing aside from hip hop, where it’s balanced out with other masculine crutches. Now you’ve got Zac Efron and High School Musical being held up as a new masculinity. I can’t help but feel that the boy bands were a part of that.”
Mr. Jennex argues groups like the Backstreet Boys and N’Sync achieved this by blurring lines of both gender and sexuality. On the one hand, they were working within a long tradition of black, masculine genre performances, enveloping influences in R&B, barbershop and hip hop. At the same time, they were performing dance routines and call-and-response vocal lines that not only recall feminine musical forms but also suggest an undercurrent of homoeroticism.
“There’s this one Backstreet Boys song, Anywhere for You, where Nick and Brian sing back-and-forth at each other in alternating lines, describing a relationship that could easily be understood as their own,” he says. “I was fascinated: if this was a male and female vocalist, it would be treated as the most romantic love song ever, but it’s two guys and because of that we don’t read it in that way.” When he defends his thesis later this month, he hopes to have a couple of friends perform the song to help prove the point.
He’ll also be presenting his research at the 2010 Canadian conference for the International Association for the Study of Popular Music in June – a rare opportunity for an undergrad. And this fall he’ll be going to McMaster to start his MA in Cultural Studies and Critical Theory, researching how hate groups use music to promote their cause.
“I have to admit, it’s pretty awesome to get to tell people that I research things like boy bands,” he laughs. “It gets some funny looks, for sure.”
Pop goes the world
|
Twitter

Readers Say
March 20, 2010 11:16 AM
March 22, 2010 6:37 AM
Zac Efron and High School musical, are NOT signs of masculinity. A guy doing something, even if it gains popularity, does not make it masculine... or manly.
p.s. Backstreet boys are better then N'sync. :)
March 22, 2010 8:15 AM
March 22, 2010 8:39 AM
March 22, 2010 10:19 AM
Way to go, bro :)
-croissant
March 22, 2010 3:25 PM
"Eagleton traces the rise of cultural theory through its golden age (c. 1965-80), and bemoans its decline into a shallow, depoliticized preoccupation with sex and pop-culture ephemera. As grad students churn out "reverential essays on Friends," latter-day cultural theorists espouse a "dim-witted" postmodernism that dismisses as hegemonic claptrap all talk of common values, objective truth and coherent historical narratives..."
March 23, 2010 12:45 PM
How thoughtful of you to assert your elitism AND berate Craig's hard work all without even having read his thesis.
You must really know your stuff!
March 23, 2010 1:28 PM
March 24, 2010 12:42 PM
How thoughtful of YOU to assert my assertion of elitism, a word which in any case I do not find pejorative.
However, the tenor of the article (the latest in a string of ones in this vein) suggests the exact academic zeitgeist
to which Mr. Eagleton's book is attuned, and for those who are curious, I merely suggest that they should read it.
As for your categorization of my remarks as berating to Mr. Jennex ("berate: to scold or condemn vehemently and at length" Merriam-Webster) the claim strikes me as silly.
I will confess however, since you touched a nerve, to being disheartened at what I perceive as the growth in the Department of Music in general, as away from a focus on the creations of musical intelligence to a concern with sociological observations about "pop culture" events. But hey, I suppose it puts "bums in seats" as the recruiters are wont to say.
March 25, 2010 4:57 PM
I think you're just jealous that nobody wrote an article about YOUR thesis ;)
March 25, 2010 6:18 PM
The classical canon (and I love my Rach, Brahms, etc.) is not the only legitimate body of music.
March 26, 2010 12:42 PM
I cordially invite you to attend any of the popular music courses offered at Dal (or any of our robust offerings on the music of the Western canon, for that matter).
I think you will find that our approach is neither "superficial" nor "jejune", and I can assure you that we've read our Eaglegton. Musicology (and other fields) had the debate over the legitimacy of studying popular culture decades ago. The exclusivist, Eurocentric arguments lost out resoundingly and conclusively, and the academy has been much the better for it.
It isn't just a matter of putting bums in seats; the growing enrolments in Musicology courses at Dal is merely a happy side effect of the fact that our courses - both those on popular music and on the canonical repertory - are relevant and valuable.
Sincerely,
Steven Baur
Department of Music
March 26, 2010 2:22 PM