Respect for heavy metal
By Marilyn Smulders - January 27, 2010
![]() |
| Music student Eric Hardiman in the Dal Arts Centre. (Danny Abriel Photo) |
Sweaty biceps, skin-tight leather, loud, distorted guitars and power vocals that blow off the Richter scale—heavy metal appeals to the discerning music fan.
Fans like Eric Hardiman, who keep heavy metal alive and thrashing through the waxing and waning of its popularity. As the Halifax resident studied music at Dalhousie for his undergraduate degree, his love of heavy metal sometimes grated against the Department of Music’s emphasis on classical music. But he was able to bring the two interests together—culminating in his performance of a classical violin concerto on electric guitar during Dalhousie Concerto Night.
Discovering Robert Walser’s Running with the Devil, he found a kinship with an academic who could see parallels between 19th century Romanticism and heavy metal. Posits Dr. Walser: Is the “aural adventure” of Van Halen’s Eruption a huge stretch from Prelude in C Major? The virtuosity of Deep Purple’s Ritchie Blackmore much different from the brilliance of Liszt or Paganini?
Reading Running with the Devil was an eye-opening experience. A professor of music at UCLA, Dr. Walser brings legitimacy and respect to the study of heavy metal. With roots in blues-rock and psychedelic rock, the bands that created heavy metal developed a dense guitar-and-drums-centred sound, characterized by amplified distortion and blistering guitar solos. As Mr. Hardiman remarks, “it’s not just thoughtless, head-banging music. There’s something to be said for virtuosity and proficiency at playing, the speed and aggressiveness of the sound.”
As the first student to enroll in the Department of Music’s new master’s of musicology program, Mr. Hardiman also aims to bring recognition to heavy metal music. He recently received a Canada Graduate Scholarship through the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) to embark on his research.
Specifically, he’s interested in the contributions women have made to the testosterone-fuelled genre, from the management savvy of Sharon Osbourne, to the vocal prowess of Ann Wilson in Heart and the influence of vocal instructor Melissa Cross, “who teaches men to be men,” he says. And it’s on the point of the gender where he begs to differ with Dr. Walser and other critics, who argue heavy metal is strictly “no-girls allowed.”
A longtime guitar instructor, now with Long & McQuade in Halifax, Mr. Hardiman says he grew up listening to bands like Cream, Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath and Metallica and playing music with his “metalhead” drummer brother. Once he finishes his thesis, his aim is to become a professor and teach musicology.
“Teaching is like a rock show without the lights,” he says.
Twitter
Readers Say
January 28, 2010 9:44 AM
January 28, 2010 11:24 AM
Deep Purple are not a metal band
Heart are not a metal band
Cream are not a metal band
Led Zeppelin are not a metal band
Hard rock and metal are not the same thing. Music geek quibbles aside, he's right; metal is not inherently masculine, and women can pull it off just as well as men. See Thorr's Hammer in particular.
January 28, 2010 11:39 AM
January 28, 2010 1:13 PM
January 28, 2010 1:25 PM
January 28, 2010 2:51 PM
Regarding the comment that many hard rock bands above are not considered heavy metal by today's standard is rather myopic. If you look at the history of rock from the mid sixties the term was used. Bands such as Led Zeppelin and Cream were really considered heavy metal.
Rock on Eric!
January 28, 2010 3:46 PM
Some of the groups mentioned are almost easy listening compared to some of the so-called 'death metal' groups, although everything is definitely relative..... It is great to realize that music historians are seeing the inherent value in such a variety of music. History is history, like it or not.
January 29, 2010 9:33 AM
January 29, 2010 10:08 AM
While women involved in the genre may not be as prominent as the male frontmen, they definitely have an impact and the genre may not have been the same as it is today without them.
May the Four Horsemen be with you, Eric.
January 29, 2010 1:34 PM
January 30, 2010 11:11 AM
Ignore the moronic quote about a few of the bands you mentioned as not being heavy metal. The fact that the person said Led Zeppelin wasn't metal is ignorant, but at the same time, good for a laugh.
February 2, 2010 12:40 PM
February 3, 2010 12:25 PM
Aidan Hayes: I do believe that people are entitled to their own opinions, but Cream influenced Deep Purple, said by Tony Iommi (Black Sabbath's guitarist) to be the original heavy metal band. It may not be what metal is today, but it's still pretty damned heavy. And how do you feel about Jethro Tull and Rush being considered metal? How about the entire Punk genre being considered metal? Give "Metal: A Head Banger's Journey" a watch, might make you see what is considered metal by most. And hard rock is a sub genre of metal.
Great article. My sister sent me a link to it, and it made me pretty happy. I just wish that there were more comparisons made between Classical and Heavy Metal. I mean, what about Vagner?
February 4, 2010 1:40 PM
August 18, 2011 3:15 PM
AC/DC is not Metal. They are Heavy Metal/ Stadium Rock.
Cream is not metal. They are bluesy, Psychedelic Rock.
Heart is not a metal band. They are nothing more than (occasional) hard rock, with some folk.
Van Halen is not a metal band. Van Halen is true Hard Rock. They kind of cross the border into the Metal subgenre because they can kind of be considered Hair Metal.
Deep Purple is not a metal band. Deep Purple set up what is today's Hard Rock genre. NWOBHM. Heavy Metal. Not Metal.
Led Zeppelin is not a metal band. NWOBHM. Heavy Metal, Hard Rock, Pschedelic Rock (kind of), Bluesy for sure, and majorly folk.
Judas Priest is NWOBHM, but they are FOR SURE Metal. Speed metal, even.
I could go on and on. Look at my name. Two references to great bands. I know my stuff.