Say what you need to say

By Jim Vibert - September 21, 2009

Fifty-four per cent of Dalhousie employees – that’s 1,447 of a possible 2,696 – completed the 2009 Workplace Study survey and the majority consider Dal a pretty good place to work. 

The full report from the survey can be found at www.humanresources.dal.ca. What follows here are selected highlights, reproduced to offer employees and others an opportunity to comment below the story.

Morale

Significant majorities of employees reported they look forward to coming to work, enjoy their work and are proud to work at Dalhousie. Seventy-six per cent said they would recommend Dalhousie as a good place to work. Smaller numbers – a bare majority – said Dal is a fun place to work.

Direction

Overall, 57 per cent of employees said they think the university is headed in the right direction.  More staff (60 per cent) felt that way than faculty (48 per cent).

Sixty per cent of respondents said they have a high (10 per cent) or moderate (50 per cent) level of awareness of the university’s strategic direction. Fewer (43 per cent) reported awareness of the President’s Strategic Focus, where Dalhousie's strategy is articulated. (Find the President's Strategic Focus online: http://senioradmin.dal.ca/president/reports.php)

It seems senior administration is known to employees, with 83 per cent reporting they know who Dal’s president and vice-presidents are. Only 29 per cent however, reported that they felt the presidents and VPs are open to input from employees. The senior leaders faired slightly better with faculty (31 per cent) than with staff (28 per cent) on this measure. Half the respondents said the president and VPs are doing a good job. Deans were rated slightly lower (44 per cent) on the same measure, but faired better with faculty, 55 per cent of whom felt deans are doing a good job.

Compensation/job security

Seventy-three per cent of faculty said they completely (24 per cent) or mostly (49 per cent) agree that they are fairly compensated in terms of wages; and 71 per cent agree that Dalhousie’s benefits package meets their needs. Administrative staff members were not so sure. Half of the staff agreed they are fairly compensated and 61 per cent said the benefits package meets their needs. 

A split in opinion exists on the question of teaching workload: six in 10 faculty agree this is reasonable, while two in 10 express disagreement, and the remainder are neutral. Faculty under the age of 35, or those who have not reached a professor designation, are least likely to agree their teaching workload is reasonable. 

Two-thirds of the employees feel their job at the university is secure (one in 10 disagree). Faculty members are most likely to completely agree with the statement. Those who feel least secure about job security are employees with less than five years of employment and members of the NSUPE union.

Job satisfaction

The overwhelming majority of Dal employees – faculty and staff – are satisfied with their job.  Overall, 77 per cent responded in the affirmative to that question.  About half the respondents believe Dal to be among the best employers in the city and only eight per cent disagreed with a statement making that claim. 

Ninety per cent of faculty and 80 per cent of staff gain a sense of accomplishment from working at Dalhousie.

While faculty are more likely than staff to agree their work has a positive impact on students and that they have the opportunity to do interesting work, all employees are mostly favourable when evaluating general working conditions at the university.

Workplace culture

Inquiries about the workplace culture on campus drew a moderately satisfied assessment from employees, with faculty consistently less so than staff. Overall, 7 out of 10 employees are comfortable in Dalhousie’s workplace culture. Feedback on particular aspects are reflected as follows: my workplace reflects diverse cultural communities (60 per cent agree); an appropriate mix of experience levels exists (63 per cent agree); my department values and recognizes diversity (64 per cent agree); and the university strives to create a diverse workplace (61 per cent agree).

When asked if Dalhousie is a better place to work now than it was two years ago, more than half surveyed were neutral or didn’t offer an opinion. Staff employees are more likely than faculty to agree that Dalhousie is a better place to work today. Those with the shortest employment history were most likely refrain from offering an opinion.

Other issues

Only one-third of faculty employees agree that the university supports their research needs, while an equal number express disagreement. Those most likely to review the university’s support more positively are full professors and those aged 55 and older. Faculty members with between five and 20 years of employment are least likely to agree.

The job classification system at Dal was panned by respondents, about a quarter of whom said it was fair and fairly administered. There were no specific questions about parking.

Only a quarter of those responding agree the university makes decisions in a timely fashion.

Most employees (66 per cent) either mostly (51 per cent) or completely (16 per cent) agree with the statement that Dalhousie operates in a socially responsible manner.

LINKS: 2009 Workplace Survey (PDF) on Dalhousie's Human Resources website

Readers Say

Sounds like a consensus between students and employees. It seems like Dal would get an average around B-, which is something with which I agree. It's a good university, but it isn't quite at great university level, yet. I think if there's just a little fine tuning, it could easily reach that level.
Sounds like a consensus between students and employees. It seems like Dal would get an average around B-, which is something with which I agree. It's a good university, but it isn't quite at great university level, yet. I think if there's just a little fine tuning, it could easily reach that level.
Congratulations Dal for receiving so many positive results from the survey. Dal deserves an excellent grade level as a place to work - but does need some fine tuning. The potential is definitely there.

It is terrific to see the administration being so committed to making Dal an excellent place for all. Many people are really putting forth a sterling effort to make this happen. Kudos to you all.

The research results are a bit of a wake-up call. Achieving a good balance between teaching and research has always been difficult to achieve. They affect each other, so both are very important. It is doable, just not easy.

Every best wish on the next survey. I hope even more faculty and staff respond, now that they have seen this report.
"There were no specific questions about parking."

Does this mean there were no questions about parking in the survey? Or that there were no questions posed? Because I for one asked several questions about parking when I completed the survey.
"There were no specific questions about parking."

Does this mean there were no questions about parking in the survey? Or that there were no questions posed? Because I for one asked several questions about parking when I completed the survey.
Too bad the poll didn't ask about parking. As a faculty member on campus, I am constantly enraged at the fact that there is no dedicated faculty parking. How much $ is the university spending on salaries while their top-paid employees are driving around looking for a place to put their cars? This is a poor use of university and student $. The collective time spent by faculty members looking for parking could be better used answering student emails, preparing for classes, doing research, or even doing university administration. And the money being paid per hour for faculty to be driving around parking lots is a shameful waste (far more expensive, I should think, than the cost of providing dedicated parking to those who live off the peninsula).
Seems like a crap mark, around a C to B- but I guess dal gets what it deserves. I wouldnt be happy with those grades and I don't think Dal should be either.

Parking? Maybe you should cycle or take the bus...all the cool faculty are doing it ;)
Seems like a crap mark, around a C to B- but I guess dal gets what it deserves. I wouldnt be happy with those grades and I don't think Dal should be either.

Parking? Maybe you should cycle or take the bus...all the cool faculty are doing it ;)
Are the numbers positive or negative... overall.....history will tell us, I suppose.

The larger questions is...what is the comparator institution (s).....or benchmark to which we can compare ourselves.....

Perhaps, a clear set of standards should be listed......to achieve greatness (or inspire minds) we truly need to know what the world considers great....or are we just mediocre.. To be competetive, dont we need to know the competition ?????

If students produced marks of C/B-, would this be enough for most of Dal's programs......food for thought.....
Are the numbers positive or negative... overall.....history will tell us, I suppose.

The larger questions is...what is the comparator institution (s).....or benchmark to which we can compare ourselves.....

Perhaps, a clear set of standards should be listed......to achieve greatness (or inspire minds) we truly need to know what the world considers great....or are we just mediocre.. To be competetive, dont we need to know the competition ?????

If students produced marks of C/B-, would this be enough for most of Dal's programs......food for thought.....
The culture of the University would improve significantly if top-paid employees were less arrogant. Just because a professor makes big $, or lives in Dartmouth, does not mean it is alright to suggest others are less worthy of access to parking. I would argue top-paid employees have more flexibility and transportation options. If they insist upon bringing an automobile to the University there are many private parking providers in the area - Impark, Canpark and Fenwick to name a few.
Wow DNR. You may want to look around at the rest of the job market. In most places, you get fired if you're hunting for parking on company time.

There are lots of options for parking including reserved spots (that most can afford with those swanky faculty salaries), paid meters, street parking and of course the hunting passes. While the parking at Dalhousie could be vastly improved, I doubt the argument you make will hold any water with anyone ever.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)