Tree time

By Marilyn Smulders - July 8, 2009

Charles Harrington and Matt Follett measure the circumference of the massive Red Oak behind Sherriff Hall. (Bruce Bottomley Photo)

The Red Oak was well established when Edward Cornwallis arrived on Halifax’s shores in 1749, and already impressive when George Ramsay, the ninth Earl of Dalhousie, decided to establish a college in Halifax in the early 19th century.

Looking a bit like the Whomping Willow described in the Harry Potter books, Quercus rubra has a trunk that measures 167 centimetres in diameter and is more than 19 metres tall. Located behind Sherriff Hall, its massive canopy shades the sidewalk on Oxford Street.

Arborist Matt Follett estimates the tree’s vintage at 300 years, perhaps more. Thought to be Dalhousie’s oldest tree, it was one of the more interesting things discovered so far in the course of doing a “natural inventory” for Dalhousie’s Office of Sustainability.

Other noteworthy finds: a grove of mature oaks situated behind the Life Sciences Centre, a patch of blueberries (but no one’s saying exactly where) and, from the Magnolia family, a recently planted tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), a species rarely seen in Nova Scotia.

Matt Follet is the arborist leading the natural inventory, with help from Charles Harrington and Christopher Boyle. (Bruce Bottomley Photo)

“We’re taking a look at the trees we have on the grounds of Dalhousie in an effort to understand what we have and what we should do to improve,” says Mr. Follett, an environmental science student and self-described “tree guy” who is working on the inventory with Christopher Boyle, a master’s student in resource and environmental management, and Charles Harrington, an engineering grad.

While Dalhousie’s campuses are known for their ivy-covered buildings, beautiful tree-lined avenues and flower gardens, the project workers believe they could be better with more diversity of planting and especially more native species. Perhaps, they muse, there could be gardens for food production or natural areas developed for outdoor classrooms.

But first they have to assess what the university has now: they’re doing that by counting the trees, making note of what kind they are, and taking measurements of their trunks and canopies and determining height. The information will also determine the amount of carbon dioxide being offset by the trees.

“It’s a way to get a handle on our greenhouse gases,” explains Rochelle Owen, director of the Office of Sustainability. “Trees aren’t just for nice aesthetics; they have incredible economic attributes.”

In the winter, trees can also reduce the energy needed to warm campus buildings. Windbreak trees can reduce the energy required by 10 to 15 per cent.

In the summer, trees that are suitably sited can reduce cooling costs from 15 to 50 per cent. They shade buildings and streets and their leaves cool the air around them by evaporating huge quantities of water drawn up from the roots in the ground.

It is expected to take most of the summer to complete the inventory. Once complete, the project workers will make recommendations in terms of new plantings, where they should go and what they should be.

DISCUSSION: What kinds of things would you like to see to enhance the natural environment on campus?

Readers Say

Matt Follet, the arborist, should look for the fine mature trees on the east side of the Brain Centre and look at the initial plans that were clearly drawn to save these trees. Indeed the President of the University said so publicly. Then in a sudden suicidal crash they all fell over as they were chainsawed in a matter of minutes apparently with the full approval of Facilities Management, or some other person who has no regard for our environment let alone the public face of the university and its relationship to the city that hosts it.

The new buildings that we are building for the University are right on the street line and we are told there is no room for trees. Often we take down the city's trees and we seem loathe to replace them. There are four recent examples on LeMarchant Street and let me predict that we will find a reason to not replace these. Perhaps we expect the City to repair our damage? I do not know but I will bet that Dalhousie has no clear policy about replacing trees lost through any reason.

A tree planted by the class of 1948 at the top of University Ave. went over in Hurricane Juan in 2003. The tilted over stump remained and the plaque remained to mock the good intentions of all visiting alumni for almost five years. The stump is only recently gone and the plaque simply put in front of a convenient nearby tree. The tree has not been replaced.

Regards

Alan Ruffman
I'd like to see the History and Music dept. get together and plan a Victorian Garden like that seen in NS Museums where musicians play chamber music on Sunday afternoons.
Facilities Management should consider establishing gardens on top of the various roofs of the Life Sciences Centre. For inexpensive planting ideas, see a recent issue of National Geographic. These roof gardens would be enjoyed by students, faculty and visitors during tea breaks and lunchtime. Also, it would improve the sparse look of cobble stones on top of most of the Life Sciences Centre.
With all the new buildings being erected by Dalhousie they should be planning for green roofs for them. The campus takes up a lot of ground space, there is no reason all the square footage of the buildings cant be put to good environmental use.
St Mary's places signs near many of its trees. These name the species and provide information about such things as the time of planting, the natural habitat of the species, the relationship with other species of similar name, etc. It would be great if Dalhousie could copy SMU.
Judging by the photo of the red oak, it is unlikely that the tree is more than 150 years old. A red oak in our climate was just over 20' in circumference when it had to be removed due to decay. A ring count at 37' yielded 151 rings. An extrapolated age from this data came to about 200 years old. Your tree is only 16.9' in circumference with very low branching, and multiple main trunks. It is not from 1749 or older.
Judging by the photo of the red oak, it is unlikely that the tree is more than 150 years old. A red oak in our climate was just over 20' in circumference when it had to be removed due to decay. A ring count at 37' yielded 151 rings. An extrapolated age from this data came to about 200 years old. Your tree is only 16.9' in circumference with very low branching, and multiple main trunks. It is not from 1749 or older.
Regarding the previous post, I felt some clarification was in order;

The tree is 167 cm DSH (‘diameter standard height’ which is measured at 4.5'), about 65 inches, or over 5 feet in diameter. That works out to a circumference of 204 inches or so (much larger then 16.9 inches)

While I agree that tree age is hard to determine, I'm quite sure the tree is well over 200 yrs old. While we'd love to know the age, I'm not comfortable using standard core sampling to pull a core from this tree. I would feel very bad about subjecting such a magnificent tree to this type of wounding; and finding a suitable coring site would be difficult due to the decay in the lower bole (the site would need to be up in the scaffold limbs).

The inventory is progressing well, and we will soon look at the data we have developed. A quick overview of the tree population has shown a profile the Dalhousie community can be proud of. There is certainly room for improvement, and that was what the project was intended to analyze. We will be looking at the grounds as a whole and determining where we can best put resources to improve the biodiversity of the flora environment.

Sincerely

Matt Follett,
Woody Plant Biodiversity Team Leader
Dalhousie University
Regarding the previous post, I felt some clarification was in order;

The tree is 167 cm DSH (‘diameter standard height’ which is measured at 4.5'), about 65 inches, or over 5 feet in diameter. That works out to a circumference of 204 inches or so (much larger then 16.9 inches)

While I agree that tree age is hard to determine, I'm quite sure the tree is well over 200 yrs old. While we'd love to know the age, I'm not comfortable using standard core sampling to pull a core from this tree. I would feel very bad about subjecting such a magnificent tree to this type of wounding; and finding a suitable coring site would be difficult due to the decay in the lower bole (the site would need to be up in the scaffold limbs).

The inventory is progressing well, and we will soon look at the data we have developed. A quick overview of the tree population has shown a profile the Dalhousie community can be proud of. There is certainly room for improvement, and that was what the project was intended to analyze. We will be looking at the grounds as a whole and determining where we can best put resources to improve the biodiversity of the flora environment.

Sincerely

Matt Follett,
Woody Plant Biodiversity Team Leader
Dalhousie University

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)