Escape to the suburbs

By Charles Crosby - May 25, 2009

Professor Jill Grant. (Nick Pearce Photo)

With over half the Canadian population now living in the suburbs, Jill Grant says it’s an obvious time to study this increasingly popular living option – one that remains a bane to urban planners and downtown boosters.

Are people drawn to the concept of perfectly matching houses throughout a neighbourhood, the “little boxes” as the Weeds theme song goes, or is it the slightly sterile lack of urban energy often associated, fairly or not, with life in the ‘burbs? More likely it’s a desire for living space inside and out that’s roomy—and that’s tough find in the downtown core of most Canadian cities.

As costs associated with living in an urban environment continue to rise, more and more Canadians are pushing outward toward these readymade neighbourhoods-in-a-box. And, Dr. Grant, professor with Dalhousie’s School of Planning in the Faculty of Architecture and Planning, is casting her gaze to the ‘burbs too. Her research project, “Trends in Residential Environments: Planning and Inhabiting the Suburbs,” recently received just over $101,000 from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada’s Standard Research Grants program.

The 'burbs, a history

Suburbs, which are essentially small communities surrounding cities, grew throughout the mid-20th century as a result of improved road and rail transportation systems, and particularly as a result of an increased embrace of commuting. In the period immediately following Second World War, population booms saw North Americans gravitate to so-called “bedroom communities”—so named because people slept in their suburb but did much of their "living" in the urban centre. Suburbs tended to grow around cities with an abundance of flat land in the surrounding areas, extending as far as the countryside. Dr. Grant notes that one of the downsides of suburban communities is the rich, valuable farmland they consume—a resource increasingly in short supply.

So, what are the impacts of such an “outward” migration? Dr. Grant has a number of theories on the effects on our cities and towns. “The suburbs and the core are affected by the same kinds of pressures and processes, but in different ways,” she says. “Since ownership of the car became quite common, living in the suburbs or in the countryside and commuting to the city has been easy. Developers looking for places to build new commercial spaces looked to the periphery to find relatively inexpensive land that would accessible to those in cars. Consequently, people and commerce drained from downtown.”

The fate of our nation’s downtowns is directly tied to the trends in the Wisteria Lanes across the country, though it isn’t all in the direction of more or better ‘burbs.

“In recent years, we see new attitudes about downtown that are renewing interest in living, working and shopping downtown,” notes Dr. Grant. “Developers are reacting to that with new projects downtown. (Halifax) is reacting with new policies like HRMbyDesign.

“At the same time, development trends in the suburbs are changing somewhat—lots are getting smaller, homes are getting closer to the street; some suburbs are developing a bit of an urban feel.”

Dr. Grant further suggests the suburban life may be getting a bit of a re-think, that the longer commuting time isn’t worth the extra square footage. “In many cities the costs (in time and money) of commuting are getting so high that people are rethinking suburban life … We’re seeing more interest in rapid transit because people want to reduce their commuting time. But rapid transit is expensive in cities that sprawl too much. The current fiscal crisis is slowing down the development a bit, but it probably won't stop suburban development. In the larger cities we are seeing suburban-urban nodes developing: ‘town centres’ that increase densities and mix uses outside of the major urban cores. That is increasing the numbers of people working outside the city cores, so it may affect commuting times and patterns.”

Dr. Grant, who has been studying trends in planning for residential development planning in Canada and around the world since 1999, will use her newest study to fill gaps in existing knowledge including learning more about the perspectives of residents of the region’s suburbs. She’ll talk to the denizens of HRM’s Ridgevales, Clayton Parks or Portland Hills to find out what attracted them to their neighbourhoods.

So the next time you’re parking the minivan in the two-car garage, rolling out the barbeque or watering your already green lawn, give some thought to why you may have chosen to become a suburbanite. Those thoughts may just end up going a long way toward answering the big questions dogging city planners everywhere.

Charles Crosby of Dalhousie’s Communications and Marketing Office lives in the suburban neighbourhood Kidston Estates.

Readers Say

I find the concept of choice in this context interesting. While I certainly cannot argue that there is a choice involved in living in the suburbs, from my experience it has a lot more to do with needs. We bought our home a few years ago. We wanted to live in the urban centre but found that our budget could only bring us to the fringes of dangerous (high traffic) neighbourhoods. A quick glance outside the peninsula into Bedford found us a number of homes within our budget which provided more living space, safer surroundings and growth potential in the value of the home.

Did we choose to live in the suburbs? Ultimately, yes we did as we could have continued to rent downtown. However the decision ends up being bound by many factors, the greatest of which being cost.

Will higher fuel costs change that equation? Nope. As the costs of commuting increase, so will the demand for space nearer the core. Quite likely in lockstep. The housing that will reduce commuting costs will rise in price to overtake any advantage of moving from the suburbs to the core.
I found the article interesting but was surprised to see the communities mentioned as suburban - Ridgevales, Clayton Parks or Portland Hills. I would have considered those places to be urban areas and places like Kingswood, Tantallon, Sambro, etc as sub-urban/rural. I guess this impression is because Sambro was always considered to be in "the county" (before HRM's amalgamation) we always considered "the city" as starting in Spryfield at the former "city limits". Along those same lines, Fairview and Clayton Park would have been considered "in town". In my family's case, our choice to live in Sambro is due to our historical ties to the community because our ancestors have lived here for generations. The next biggest consideration is budget. I'd love to leave the well and septic tank behind and be on city water and sewer. We would never be able to afford have a house and lot the size of our existing home anywhere in "the city". Our house isn't lavish or large by any means, a basic 24X36 bungalo that would be considered a cottage by today's standards, sitting on a 3/4 acre lot. I think most people have the proverbial American dream of owning a house with a yard, the white picket fence, etc. I couldn't see raising my kids in a condo having to lug bicycles, strollers, and other kids toys up several floors, or living in the compressed houses and duplexes being built in the city where the house is built on a postage stamp and there isn't even enough room to put a child's swingset.
I found the article interesting but was surprised to see the communities mentioned as suburban - Ridgevales, Clayton Parks or Portland Hills. I would have considered those places to be urban areas and places like Kingswood, Tantallon, Sambro, etc as sub-urban/rural. I guess this impression is because Sambro was always considered to be in "the county" (before HRM's amalgamation) we always considered "the city" as starting in Spryfield at the former "city limits". Along those same lines, Fairview and Clayton Park would have been considered "in town". In my family's case, our choice to live in Sambro is due to our historical ties to the community because our ancestors have lived here for generations. The next biggest consideration is budget. I'd love to leave the well and septic tank behind and be on city water and sewer. We would never be able to afford have a house and lot the size of our existing home anywhere in "the city". Our house isn't lavish or large by any means, a basic 24X36 bungalo that would be considered a cottage by today's standards, sitting on a 3/4 acre lot. I think most people have the proverbial American dream of owning a house with a yard, the white picket fence, etc. I couldn't see raising my kids in a condo having to lug bicycles, strollers, and other kids toys up several floors, or living in the compressed houses and duplexes being built in the city where the house is built on a postage stamp and there isn't even enough room to put a child's swingset.
It's interesting to read this. I also find it interesting to see the differences between "suburbs" in Halifax compared to a suburb in let's say Saint John. The homes in the suburbs of Halifax and Dartmouth are different than the ones in Saint John/Quispamsis. First of all the houses have a lot more space between them in Saint John, and each house appears to have a different design. Now drive in a suburb of Dartmouth and all the houses have a similar layout/style in each neighbourhood corresponding to their period when they were built. What I'm getting to is what population density constitutes a suburb?

I think people continue to chose suburbs because it is (in my oppinion) better to raise a family in. There is more outdoor space for the children to play and suburbs tend to be safer for youngsters than a hustle bustle urban environment. As a person without a family of my own, i'd rather live in the urban core for convenience and proximity to school. If I started a family however, I'd want to live in a suburb.
I find this article amusing given that Clayton Park as a suburb is walking distance when compared to the suburbs in the Greater Toronto Area.
I find this article amusing given that Clayton Park as a suburb is walking distance when compared to the suburbs in the Greater Toronto Area.
Suburban, Urban and Rural are convenient tags used by planners. I used to live in the suburbs but HRM recently changed that to urban at least for tax purposes. The only change I've seen is more frequent noisy buses.
Roughly four hundred houses are being built in Middle Sackville. There is absolutely nothing there, even elementary students will have to be bused somewhere else. No one wants the extra traffic so there will only be two exits out of the subdivision. Extra sewer flow will cause problems with existing homes.
HRM by Design? I don't think so. A good design would have rec facilities, schools, commercial space etc. As people move in it would be interesting to ask them about lifestyle changes.
Suburban, Urban and Rural are convenient tags used by planners. I used to live in the suburbs but HRM recently changed that to urban at least for tax purposes. The only change I've seen is more frequent noisy buses.
Roughly four hundred houses are being built in Middle Sackville. There is absolutely nothing there, even elementary students will have to be bused somewhere else. No one wants the extra traffic so there will only be two exits out of the subdivision. Extra sewer flow will cause problems with existing homes.
HRM by Design? I don't think so. A good design would have rec facilities, schools, commercial space etc. As people move in it would be interesting to ask them about lifestyle changes.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)