Campus plan moves forward

By Mary Somers - April 15, 2009

The consultants have singled out University Avenue as an area of attention in the Master Campus Plan—redefining it as "Dalhousie's front door." (Nick Pearce Photo)

What does a bicycle, University Avenue, a downtown campus and future building blocks have in common? They’re all part of the first progress report from the consultants for the Master Campus Plan.

The 22-page report is available at the new Campus Plan website: campusplan.dal.ca.

The report has been developed following hundreds of public consultation meetings, workshops and online comments.

Planning began last summer when IBI Group, a multi-disciplinary planning and design firm, was hired as the consultant. Internal meetings began and then phase one of the public consultation process was held in October. Phase-two workshops, or charets, spanned a week in early March.

The consultants talked to more than 100 individuals and groups within the university community, the surrounding neighbourhoods and the Halifax region concerning the future development of the campus.

“We have heard a wide range of views, needs and visions, and we have considered a comparable range of available information, data and site observations,” say the consultants in the report. “While we will continue to expand our information base, this report will summarize what we have learned so far.”

Key themes of the plan

The report notes eight key themes that have evolved throughout the consultation process and will help to shape the emerging Campus Master Plan.
1. Dal’s need to compete worldwide for students and money
2. Better integration and connectivity of the campuses
3. The urban role and intensification of the university
4. The importance of Sexton Campus as the “downtown” campus
5. A focus on student experience
6. The redevelopment of University Avenue
7. Transportation /parking/walking, bikes/car pooling/transit
8. A continuing commitment to sustainability

The plan, when completed, will have three time frames: new projects, “swing” projects and "major future building blocks."

New projects can start immediately as money becomes available. These include transforming University Avenue and improving signage, lighting and landscaping.

“Swing” projects would be built in the near future without causing major disruption to the existing campus and produce much-needed space. Such projects could include expanding the Killam Library to accommodate student services and learning resources, redeveloping the Grad House, renovating Dalplex and adding more medical sciences research facilities at University and Summer Streets (currently the construction site of the Life Sciences Research Centre).

Major future building blocks are projects to be developed as needed and when funding becomes available. These recognize that change is inevitable and fraught with uncertainty. The blocks can be used for opportunities that present themselves, including a major growth spurt at the downtown campus (now Sexton Campus) or changes in academic disciplines.
The framework also will avoid “willy-nilly development that does not add up to a sensible, sustainable, efficient and pleasing environment,” the report says.

The report says the university cannot realize its long-term development plans without public/private partnerships. It will have to collaboration with the province, the city, the neighborhoods, the Capital District Health Authority and other postsecondary institutions. The university will need to become involved in neighbourhood and regional planning and development and work with stakeholders on such issues as municipal zoning and development guidelines.

“This will require the joint effort and collaboration of Dalhousie, its neighours, HRM staff and council members,” says the report.

The second progress report is expected this fall.

The parking issue

Does Dalhousie lack adequate parking spaces or does it lack solutions to its parking and transportation issues?

Those are the questions asked in the first progress report of the Master Campus Plan. The consultants heard from many people about how they drive in circles looking for a parking space. This causes frustration, wasted time and has a negative impact on the environment and the surrounding neighbourhoods.

“What are the necessary measures to foster alternatives to the automobile that can reduce the need for parking?” asks the report. “What can make walking, bikes, car pooling and transit more viable in the future?”

The report also asks how university land, now used for parking lots, could be converted to buildings and open spaces needed to meet faculty and student needs.

The report suggests a long-range strategy. It would include:
• remote sites where people could park their cars and then ride a shuttle to campus
• more incentives for car pooling
• wide and well-lit bike and pedestrian corridors
• a campus-wide bike loan program
• structured parking to conserve land
• a more balanced pricing system for parking
• U-Passes for staff and faculty
• a shared university-hospital shuttle
• affordable neighbourhood housing

But the report cautions that comprise will have to be a major part of any transportation and parking plan. There will need to be collaboration among the university administration, the Dalhousie Student Union, the Dalhousie Faculty Association, HRM, Metro Transit, neighbourhood and business groups, and other institutions on the peninsula, says the report.

The Phase-two Progress Report, due late this fall, will recommend a series of projects that could be introduced. These will include transit and transportation approaches aimed at reducing the demand for parking.

Readers Say

I'm a little disappointed with the level of *student* consultation in this process. While Dalhousie has a large impact on the surrounding community, students and their opinions should should be priority one at this university.

If senior administrators decide what our needs are instead of us, it's likely to lead to some serious issues in the future.

We *were* invited to the master plan charettes...a couple days before they happened...I think maybe 5 students at most showed up to these - and let me be clear - A LOT more students than that care about this process. It is NOT a matter of student apathy, it's a matter of failing to actively engage the student body.
I agree!

I'm a student who is very interested in the new campus master plan, but the fact that I had only realized yesterday that there was a progress report published in March, shows that they're not making much effort to make it availible to the students. That progress report should have been e-mailed to everybody, not just stuck on the website without a word to anyone.
Our university is in desperate need of affordable overnight parking for students, The only option for overnight parking for students who live in residence is a stiffly priced parking pass underneath a limited Risley parking lot. the price to park overnight for a year is 1,200! ridiculous! I would like to see a plan put forward for this issue, as I am sure I am not the only one who has run into this problem.I have received two overnight parking tickets due to this problem.
Our university is in desperate need of affordable overnight parking for students, The only option for overnight parking for students who live in residence is a stiffly priced parking pass underneath a limited Risley parking lot. the price to park overnight for a year is 1,200! ridiculous! I would like to see a plan put forward for this issue, as I am sure I am not the only one who has run into this problem.I have received two overnight parking tickets due to this problem.
I am generally quite impressed with the phase I report, particularly with the key themes that were identified. These themes would serve well as design goals for the remainder of the project. It was great to see that the importance of the urban role, intensification and campus connectivity were recognized as key issues. I love the simple idea of abandoning the studley, carleton and sexton names and going with downtown, health sciences (middle?) and upper campuses. It was very important that the consultants were not tricked by all of the short thinking, self-centered private automobile owners' comments on parking. Its great that the consultants recognize the need for deeper analysis on the root causes of this issue and suggest some creative alternative solutions to the issue. I was relieved to see the words Transportation Demand Management. The University Ave. redesign has a lot of potential and they offered some interesting solutions. I'm not sure they fully understand or have fully explored the downtown campus and its potential. I only hope the University can be forward thinking and open-minded enough to fully embrace the ideas of intensification, mixed-use, in-fill and adaptive re-use, removing cars from streets and collaboration.
We need construction to release more job oppurtunity under the economy downturn, I think this is the best time to rebulit the poor hardware which is not match for the univerisity level... It would cost less today...
We need construction to release more job oppurtunity under the economy downturn, I think this is the best time to rebulit the poor hardware which is not match for the univerisity level... It would cost less today...

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)