Why emergency text system wasn't used

By Marilyn Smulders - January 14, 2009

Halifax Police respond to the robbery at PCPC on Tuesday. (Bruce Bottomley Photo)

Questions have been raised about emergency communications in the wake of an armed robbery at PCPC (Personal Computer Purchasing Centre).

Shortly after noon on Tuesday, Dalhousie University’s computer store, PCPC, was held up by a lone man who appeared to have a gun. Wearing a bandana and black sunglasses, he demanded staff fill a large Adidas gym bag with laptop computers and then fled. Campus security and Halifax Police responded immediately after store employees sounded the alarm.

No one was hurt during the incident and police assessed immediately no ongoing risk to anyone on Dalhousie’s Studley campus.

“The emergency alert message was not used in the aftermath of the robbery at PCPC, raising legitimate questions as to why not,” says Jim Vibert, assistant vice-president of Communications and Marketing at Dalhousie. “The answer is simple and complicated. The simple answer is: it wasn’t necessary and would have been inappropriate.

“The complicated answer is that the entire incident at PCPC lasted less than a minute. Staff at the store, by the way, handled the robbery exactly as they should have. Dal Security and Halifax Police responded immediately and were on the scene in a very few minutes. Police quickly determined that there was no reason to assume there was any ongoing threat to people on Dal campus. The guy was gone.”

The text message emergency system will be activated to alert users to an emergency or other situation that requires or recommends some action on their part. For example, if there was a fire on campus, an alert might read “Fire @ A&A Stay away.” Text messages are meant to be brief; the Dalhousie system is limited to 120 characters.

In the aftermath of the robbery, no action from students, faculty or staff was required or advised, says Mr. Vibert. The police had determined the risk, in this case the thief, was gone. A terse emergency message to the effect that PCPC had experienced an armed robbery would have served no purpose in terms of improving the safety of anyone, and could have unnecessarily raised anxieties.

In this case, the more complete security bulletin was posted on the main Dalhousie webpage within 90 minutes of the incident. It was followed quickly by a more complete story on Dalnews and an email from VP Academic Alan Shaver.

“These were the appropriate communications to the community,” says Mr. Vibert. “Some will disagree, and that’s OK.  But, if we had to do it all over again, we’d do the same thing.”

Readers Say

Timely article. It not only answers the question 'why didn't you...?' in a given situation, but also clarifies the appropriate uses for the emergency text messaging system. Thanks.
Timely article. It not only answers the question 'why didn't you...?' in a given situation, but also clarifies the appropriate uses for the emergency text messaging system. Thanks.
I agree with the decision so long as someone actually saw him LEAVE the campus and witnessed it. It's one thing to say "oh yeah he left the STORE but ran off in the direction of the library." But overall in general I don;t think it was necessary to use the emergency texting system; I think that would have been a bit pointless.
I agree with the decision so long as someone actually saw him LEAVE the campus and witnessed it. It's one thing to say "oh yeah he left the STORE but ran off in the direction of the library." But overall in general I don;t think it was necessary to use the emergency texting system; I think that would have been a bit pointless.
I agree, the hysteria that might have arisen from a vague "Beware Adidas gym bag - thief on the loose." text message would have outweighed any possible benefits. Thank you for the clarification on when the system is to be used.
I agree, the hysteria that might have arisen from a vague "Beware Adidas gym bag - thief on the loose." text message would have outweighed any possible benefits. Thank you for the clarification on when the system is to be used.
I agree that there was no need to use the text messaging because of the robbery. However, why the system was not activated yesterday when a decision was taken to close Dal because of the weather conditions?
I found myself and as well as many other students at Sexton Campus stranded out trying to find a shelter for the next hours to keep us from the nasty weather. It was a mistake not to use the text messaging, and locking the doors was a huge mistake.

Informing students about school closure through the website was stupid because nobody would check his/her email or Dal website early in the morning.

If the university is concerned about the student’s safety, then it was better to keep the doors open to accommodate the students who left out dealing with the slippery conditions and rainy weather. I hope that Dal takes the right decisions in the future and uses effective ways to inform students in case of emergencies.
Yesterday, when a text was sent to notify the opening of the Uni at 11:30...I recieved the message at 12:45.

I'm not sure of others having such delay, but this would be another reason to make the text warning of the robbery pointless. Chances are the warning would be too late for most, the system is kind of crappy/slow.

It's better than nothing, though. Unless they're eventually raising our tuition to partially pay for it.
Same thing happened with me Andrew.

The text message for the Snow Storm only got to me about an hour after Dal had re-opened. This text messaging service is turning out to be a joke. Whenever they are testing it, I never get a text message, and then when there is a cancellation and the school re-opens, I find out when it's too late.

Worst of all, this text messaging system is not only costing us in terms of tuition, but now I get charged by my phone company for lousy, late text messages that are too late and pointless.

The idea is on the right track... as long as it works.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)