Taser tragedies

Questions are being asked about the proper use of force

By Ryan McNutt - November 29, 2007

A University of Florida student is led away and tasered after attempting to ask John Kerry a question at a town-hall forum.

2007 – Year of the Taser?

It sure seems that way. Several troubling incidents involving the use of Tasers by police officers and security guards this past year have led to widespread concern across North America. An unruly questioner attending a John Kerry lecture at the University of Florida tasered by campus security, infamously yelling, “Don’t tase me, bro!” A Utah highway patrol officer tasering a man after he refused to sign a speeding ticket, captured for posterity on YouTube. A Polish immigrant killed at Vancouver International Airport after being shocked with a Taser by RCMP.

This past week, questions about the use of stun guns hit home with the tragic death of Howard Hyde. A diagnosed schizophrenic, Mr. Hyde was tasered by Halifax Regional Police after becoming agitated and unruly while being booked for assault charges. Thirty hours later, he was found dead in his cell at a Dartmouth correctional facility, although some medical experts have cast doubt on whether the Taser was a direct factor in his death.

Note: The word “Taser” is actually a brand name for the most common variety of electroshock stun weapons. The word comes from an acronym for “Thomas A. Swift Electric Rifle,” a reference to the Tom Swift series of children’s science fiction novels written in the early 20th century.
Jean Hughes, an associate professor with Dalhousie’s School of Nursing who specializes in psychiatric nursing, finds this and other Taser-related incidents disturbing. She’s done several media interviews this past week, offering her views on how police and other authority figures should approach volatile situations involving not only mental health patients, but distraught individuals in general.

“When we’re thinking about reviewing practices and procedures, it’s not just about Tasers – the whole approach needs to be reviewed,” she explains.

Dr. Hughes, a former vice-president of the Canadian Mental Health Association, says that she’s concerned police forces are coming to see the stun gun as an easy way to gain control of unstable situations, but in doing so are neglecting less-violent approaches to conflict resolution.

“There are ways to work with someone who is upset that can deescalate the situation in much more effective ways than the use of physical force,” she says, naming non-threatening body movements, limiting the number of officers interacting with a suspect, and using calm and concerned language as key techniques. She also emphasizes that people with mental illness are no more likely to act out than anyone else – just about anyone could find themselves distraught in a tense situation.

Dr. Hughes believes that police officers would benefit from specific training and policies in dealing with mental health patients, but more importantly need to think beyond the immediate situation to the long-term implications of their actions.

“Evidence shows that an individual who encounters someone in authority who takes sharp control of a situation will be unlikely to trust that authority the next time because they’re afraid,” she explains. “It’s important that people who are going to be in a position to encounter distraught persons in their work be properly trained – corrections officers, health care workers, police workers, across the board.”

SEE: Canadian uproar over Tasers mirrors U.S., with several recent deaths | Police informed of tasered man's psychiatric illness

Readers Say

I agree with a recent news release that refers to the Taser as a means of torture. The taser appears to be a first line of defense for professionals trained in tactical force and it should be the last measure applied unless an imminent threat to the lives of others exists. Chilliwack, BC has also just had a man die four days after being tasered (he was in ICU for the 4 days). Reports are stated to be inconclusive as to the cause of "Taser" deaths, but in my opinion, it is likely that without the Taser, most(if not all)of these individuals would have recovered from the incident in a living state. Too many people have died where police and Tasers are involved, a moratorium should be in place until and if the Taser can be proven safe on a highly agitated individual considering all of the associated physiological symptoms. Taser deaths also have far reaching implications and one may be resistance to seeking police assistance in isolated and domestic violence incidents.
I think combining the situations in the US and Canada use of tasers should be done carefully, as the legalities around the use are very different in each country. The RCMP and regional police members are extremely well trained in when they should or should not use tasers, it is not an used as a easy means to take anyone down. Though the situations in Canada these past months are sad and unfortunate there is defiantly more to the story than stated in this article. The airport incident, I will say more should have been focused on the airports responsibility in that matter of dealing with the individual lost and frustrated; I know what it's like to be frustrated with airport service. The situation surrounding the mental health patient, police used other means before resorting to tasers, let that not be forgotten. And I am sure if you had a family member in the force you would be more sympathetic over the use of such a weapon if you had a family member who was dealing with violent individuals and do get hurt frequently on the job.

Should tasers be test/evaluated again and again, most defiantly, let's get the ugly facts on the matter, but be careful in faulting or criticizing police and security forces in Canada in utilizing them.

Join the conversation, but keep it clean, stay on the topic and be brief. Read comments policy.

Characters remaining: 2000

(optional)