Facebook frenzy
Dal responds to false online allegations of animal cruelty
By Ryan McNutt - August 22, 2007
![]() |
| Facebook removes pages deemed defamatory and fraudulent. (Abriel photo) |
Facebook has removed a group from its service that falsely accused Dalhousie University of killing dogs and puppies in its research.
On Monday, Dalhousie asked Facebook to shut down the group on the basis that it violated FacebookÕs terms of service which forbid the transmission of defamatory and fraudulent information. The group, called ÒStop Dogs and Puppies from being murdered at Dalhousie University," claimed dogs and puppies are being used for scientific and medical research at Dalhousie.
In fact, Dalhousie does not use dogs in any university research.*1 Moreover, the photo used by the group was not taken at Dalhousie University.
ÒThe tipping point, from our perspective, was when the groupÕs creator removed the discussion wall," said Jim Vibert, Assistant Vice-President of Communications and Marketing. ÒOriginally, there was energetic discussion taking place in the group, with several Dalhousie students questioning the accusations. Given the open discussion, we had no problem with the group continuing at that point.
ÒBut when the groupÕs creator took down the discussion wall after people were criticizing the inaccuracies, the content that remained was just flat-out wrong, and thatÕs something that our university simply could not tolerate."
Facebook is CanadaÕs most popular website, a social networking sensation that makes it easy to spread the word about an event or cause. Members of a Facebook group sign up to show their support for a common interest and can post comments, although the creator of this group shut down discussion after "too many complaints from people." The group was created in late July but caught fire last week, gaining more than 15,000 new members. The vast majority of the members appeared to be high school students.
Dalhousie has one of the most stringent systems for monitoring animal welfare in the country. The University Committee on Laboratory Animals (UCLA), which consists of Dalhousie scientists, veterinarians and external community members, approves all proposed projects involving animals in conjunction with guidelines laid out by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). These guidelines are followed by all Canadian universities. Dalhousie facilities are monitored by the CCAC in scheduled and unscheduled visits to ensure that optimal standards for the humane care and treatment of animals are maintained.
ÒDalhousie University has always closely followed the guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care," said University Veterinarian Sylvia Craig. ÒThe ethical and humane treatment of any animals in our care is of the utmost priority."
Carl Breckenridge, Vice-President, Research, emphasized that Dalhousie supports efforts to reduce the use of animals in research, but recognizes that responsible animal research plays a vital role in developing treatments for global ailments such as cancer, AIDS, and Multiple Sclerosis. ÒAny animal research undertaken at Dalhousie is conducted with rigorous attention to high ethical standards and humane care of the animals," he said.
For more information on the University Committee on Laboratory Animals, visit: animalethics.dal.ca
Correction: Since false accusations about Dalhousie research started making their way around Facebook, university staff have been looking through records to ensure the greatest clarity in information. While there are currently no dogs being housed or used in research at Dalhousie, pinpointing the precise time frame for when dogs may have been a part of medical or scientific investigations is challenging. In particular, the length of time between initiating a research program and publishing an academic paper can be years. This makes it difficult to quantify the exact date when the research was conducted.
When the story first broke, the figure Dalhousie was using as the last instance of research involving dogs was roughly a decade ago. Information has since come to light that suggests a date roughly six to eight years ago. Again, since that time, there have been no dogs housed or used for research at Dal.
Twitter
Readers Say
August 23, 2007 9:49 AM
-Krista Olmstead
August 23, 2007 11:58 AM
-Johny
August 23, 2007 3:46 PM
August 24, 2007 9:54 AM
August 24, 2007 6:33 PM
August 24, 2007 11:08 PM
dal.facebook.com/group.php?gid=3481335439
I notice the wall is back up.
August 24, 2007 11:21 PM
August 25, 2007 3:30 AM
August 25, 2007 8:18 AM
August 25, 2007 7:11 PM
August 25, 2007 11:05 PM
August 26, 2007 1:32 AM
but false allegations.
August 26, 2007 7:58 AM
One of your own teaches basically said you do use animals in testing
Dal works in every way to ensure that the animals are treated with kindness and dignity and no animal suffers
so in other words the animals you use in testing are treated fairly according to you?
Amy tried to speak out about something that she see as wrong just as i will.
Once you can take me on a walk through tour proving you do not use animals in tests, I will withdrawl my support form this group on facebook, and even back you. Untill then i'm going to back this group 100% because you give us no reason other then your word to believe you, and, thats all This group did as well, and, i also want to point out how you only post the comments supporting you.
The disscussion board is up on the facebook group.
Your students are having their say (not that many are speaking out) yet you will not post our comments on your page.
whos not being fair now?
This is just your sad attempt to cover up this bad publicity.
If you were smart you'd spend more time trying to prove us wrong rather then trying to shut us down, Because even if you shut us down, we will find another way back up.
Thres 20 thousand of us at the moment. How many of those do you think would be willing to speak out in public?
August 26, 2007 1:09 PM
I've since seen that the group has been put up again, and its count of members is once again climbing. Some of my own friends have joined. I sincerely hope that further action will be taken before these lies reach any more ears. Dalhousie has respect and a wonderful reputation, and I'd hate to see it defamed by uninformed sensationalists.
August 26, 2007 5:51 PM
SMU rocks !!!!!!!!!!
August 26, 2007 8:00 PM
I would really like it if Dalhousie takes legal action against the creator of that group that continues to spread her lies, still taking action to stop discussion on that same group that was supposedly shut down. Preferably being well publicized to show what people get for making such false and hurtful accusations without even pretending to research their claims first.
August 27, 2007 11:46 AM
August 27, 2007 12:50 PM
August 27, 2007 8:29 PM
August 28, 2007 1:55 AM
Stating that "rigorous attention to high ethical standards and humane care of the animals" does not make me feel better either. I would like to see you post exactly what animals in the last 13 years have been used at Dal and by Dal.
Right now I think Dal is hiding a lot. Change my mind Dal.
August 28, 2007 1:58 AM
August 28, 2007 2:02 AM
Also, why did Dal not mention anything about cats on TV?
Are you admitting officially to that?
August 28, 2007 11:51 AM
And how did the group get back up anyways after Dal had it shut down?
On one last note, I'd like to mention something from the facebook group that was posted in a discussion about how Amy's story has since changed from a time when she was walking by and heard the cruelties being inflicted on the "puppies" in the "secret" torture chambers, to a point where she actually worked at Dal and saw this experiments first hand? If she in fact worked there does she think she's the only decent human being who would have a problem with these so-called experiments? Is she the only decent human at Dal? I think not.
Anyways, that's all I have to say on this matter for now and I hope Dal gets this all cleared up and sue sue sue!!!!!!!!!!!
August 28, 2007 2:08 PM
August 28, 2007 2:52 PM
August 28, 2007 5:57 PM
August 28, 2007 6:49 PM
To make myself clear, I'm on Dal's side in this for sure, as I have worked in animal labs and have NEVER seen any cruelty taking place. However, Dal is going to have a hard time clearing its name (or will make this situation worse) if they hide which animals are being tested or if they let the media publish erroneous facts without immediate correction.
August 29, 2007 12:39 AM
August 29, 2007 9:29 AM
September 19, 2007 1:55 PM
animals are used in research, why, and for how long. Is the public privy to your veterinary records for animals used in research? They should be. As a
Dal student, I would like access to the "top quality care" supposedly given to animals in your labs. If nothing else, this could open dialogue into alternatives to animals used in research. It's about time.
September 19, 2007 1:56 PM
September 21, 2007 1:07 AM
February 12, 2008 4:32 PM
January 20, 2009 11:55 PM
Thanks
Holly
June 25, 2009 11:49 PM
October 19, 2010 6:47 PM
October 19, 2010 6:56 PM
We also want to know how many cats are being used this year?